Message ID | 1459862890-22957-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:28:10PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only > a few places returning EACCES. And EPERM looks more reasonable to me. > > So converting all EACCES to EPERM on immutable inode. > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> > --- > > I noticed this when running LTP on overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to > unexpected EACCES on immutable inode. This should be in the commit message itself, rather than "EPERM looks more reasonable". Other than that, change seems fine to me. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c index bb30f9a..4c68d91 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/inode.c @@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ int gfs2_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask) } if ((mask & MAY_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) - error = -EACCES; + error = -EPERM; else error = generic_permission(inode, mask); if (unlock) diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 1d9ca2d..7f4a40a 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ int __inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask) * Nobody gets write access to an immutable file. */ if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) - return -EACCES; + return -EPERM; } retval = do_inode_permission(inode, mask); diff --git a/fs/utimes.c b/fs/utimes.c index 85c40f4..794f5f5 100644 --- a/fs/utimes.c +++ b/fs/utimes.c @@ -92,10 +92,11 @@ static int utimes_common(struct path *path, struct timespec *times) * then we need to check permissions, because * inode_change_ok() won't do it. */ - error = -EACCES; + error = -EPERM; if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) goto mnt_drop_write_and_out; + error = -EACCES; if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode)) { error = inode_permission(inode, MAY_WRITE); if (error) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c index bcb6c19..4c4c58f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ xfs_open_by_handle( } if ((fmode & FMODE_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) { - error = -EACCES; + error = -EPERM; goto out_dput; }
In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only a few places returning EACCES. And EPERM looks more reasonable to me. So converting all EACCES to EPERM on immutable inode. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> --- I noticed this when running LTP on overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to unexpected EACCES on immutable inode. fs/gfs2/inode.c | 2 +- fs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/utimes.c | 3 ++- fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)