@@ -300,6 +300,28 @@ unsigned long vm_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
ret = security_mmap_file(file, prot, flag);
if (!ret) {
+ /*
+ * Special treatment for overlayfs:
+ *
+ * Take MAP_SHARED/PROT_READ as hint about future writes to the
+ * file (through another file descriptor). Caller might not
+ * have had such an intent, but we hope MAP_PRIVATE will be used
+ * in most such cases.
+ *
+ * If we don't copy up now and the file is modified, it becomes
+ * really difficult to change the mapping to match that of the
+ * file's content later.
+ *
+ * Copy up needs to be done without mmap_sem since it takes vfs
+ * locks which would potentially deadlock under mmap_sem.
+ */
+ if ((flag & MAP_SHARED) && !(prot & PROT_WRITE) && file) {
+ void *p = d_real(file->f_path.dentry, NULL, O_WRONLY);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(p))
+ return PTR_ERR(p);
+ }
+
if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem))
return -EINTR;
ret = do_mmap_pgoff(file, addr, len, prot, flag, pgoff,
A corner case of a corner case is when - file opened for O_RDONLY - which is then memory mapped SHARED - file opened for O_WRONLY - contents modified - contents read back though the shared mapping Unfortunately it looks very difficult to do anything about the established shared map after the file is copied up. Instead when a read-only file is mapped shared overlayfs copies up the file before actually doing the map. This may result in unnecessary copy-ups (but so may copy-up on open(O_RDWR) for exampe). We can revisit this later if it turns out to be a performance problem in real life. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> --- mm/util.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)