| Message ID | 154166792021.10655.6752271937511795324.stgit@localhost.localdomain (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | fuse: Interrupt-related optimizations and improvements | expand |
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c index ae813e609932..1ecec7fcb841 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c @@ -476,9 +476,9 @@ static void queue_interrupt(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq, struct fuse_req *req) if (list_empty(&req->intr_entry)) { list_add_tail(&req->intr_entry, &fiq->interrupts); wake_up_locked(&fiq->waitq); + kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN); } spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock); - kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN); } static void request_wait_answer(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
We should sent signal only in case of interrupt is really queued. Not a real problem, but this makes the code clearer and intuitive. v2: Move kill_fasync() under fiq->waitq.lock Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> --- fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)