diff mbox

[v2,net-next,1/4] net: socket: add support for async operations

Message ID 20150316161514.16418.67336.stgit@tstruk-mobl1 (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tadeusz Struk March 16, 2015, 4:15 p.m. UTC
Add support for async operations.

Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/net.h |    5 ++++
 net/socket.c        |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Al Viro March 19, 2015, 4:20 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:15:14AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> Add support for async operations.

NAK.  For the same reason as the last time - 

> +static ssize_t sock_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> +			     unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff);
> +static ssize_t sock_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> +			      unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff);
> +

is completely pointless.  Just have sock_read_iter() and sock_write_iter()
check if your new methods are present and use those if those are.

What's more, I'm not at all sure that you want to pass iocb that way -
kernel-side msghdr isn't tied to userland one anymore, so we might as well
stash a pointer to iocb into it.  Voila - no new methods needed at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tadeusz Struk March 19, 2015, 5:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On 03/19/2015 09:20 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> is completely pointless.  Just have sock_read_iter() and sock_write_iter()
> check if your new methods are present and use those if those are.
> 

Ok, that will work for me too.

> What's more, I'm not at all sure that you want to pass iocb that way -
> kernel-side msghdr isn't tied to userland one anymore, so we might as well
> stash a pointer to iocb into it.  Voila - no new methods needed at all.

Good point, so what do you prefer - to add iocd to msghdr or to call the new
methods from sock_read_iter() and sock_write_iter()?
Either way is good for me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Al Viro March 19, 2015, 6:13 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:43:16AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 09:20 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> > is completely pointless.  Just have sock_read_iter() and sock_write_iter()
> > check if your new methods are present and use those if those are.
> > 
> 
> Ok, that will work for me too.
> 
> > What's more, I'm not at all sure that you want to pass iocb that way -
> > kernel-side msghdr isn't tied to userland one anymore, so we might as well
> > stash a pointer to iocb into it.  Voila - no new methods needed at all.
> 
> Good point, so what do you prefer - to add iocd to msghdr or to call the new
> methods from sock_read_iter() and sock_write_iter()?
> Either way is good for me.

I'd probably add msg_iocb to the end of struct msghdr and explicitly zero it in
copy_msghdr_from_user() and get_compat_msghdr(), but you are asking the wrong
guy - that sort of choices in net/* falls on davem, not me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
index e74114b..e9180bf 100644
--- a/include/linux/net.h
+++ b/include/linux/net.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
+#include <linux/aio.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/net.h>
 
 struct poll_table_struct;
@@ -173,6 +174,10 @@  struct proto_ops {
 	 */
 	int		(*recvmsg)   (struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
 				      size_t total_len, int flags);
+	int		(*aio_sendmsg)(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
+				       struct msghdr *m);
+	int		(*aio_recvmsg)(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
+				       struct msghdr *m, int flags);
 	int		(*mmap)	     (struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
 				      struct vm_area_struct * vma);
 	ssize_t		(*sendpage)  (struct socket *sock, struct page *page,
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 95d3085..1364dfb 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -132,6 +132,11 @@  static ssize_t sock_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
 				struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
 				unsigned int flags);
 
+static ssize_t sock_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
+			     unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff);
+static ssize_t sock_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
+			      unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff);
+
 /*
  *	Socket files have a set of 'special' operations as well as the generic file ones. These don't appear
  *	in the operation structures but are done directly via the socketcall() multiplexor.
@@ -144,6 +149,8 @@  static const struct file_operations socket_file_ops = {
 	.write =	new_sync_write,
 	.read_iter =	sock_read_iter,
 	.write_iter =	sock_write_iter,
+	.aio_read =	sock_aio_read,
+	.aio_write =	sock_aio_write,
 	.poll =		sock_poll,
 	.unlocked_ioctl = sock_ioctl,
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -836,6 +843,62 @@  static ssize_t sock_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	return res;
 }
 
+static ssize_t sock_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
+			     unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff)
+{
+	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
+	struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
+	struct iov_iter iter;
+	struct msghdr msg = {0};
+	ssize_t res;
+
+	if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+		msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
+	if (iocb->ki_pos != 0)
+		return -ESPIPE;
+
+	if (iocb->ki_nbytes == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (sock->ops->aio_recvmsg) {
+		iov_iter_init(&iter, READ, iov, nr_segs, iocb->ki_nbytes);
+		msg.msg_iter = iter;
+		res = sock->ops->aio_recvmsg(iocb, sock, &msg, msg.msg_flags);
+	} else {
+		res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	return res;
+}
+
+static ssize_t sock_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
+			      unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t loff)
+{
+	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
+	struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
+	struct iov_iter iter;
+	struct msghdr msg = {0};
+	ssize_t res;
+
+	if (iocb->ki_pos != 0)
+		return -ESPIPE;
+
+	if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+		msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
+	if (sock->type == SOCK_SEQPACKET)
+		msg.msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
+
+	if (sock->ops->aio_sendmsg) {
+		iov_iter_init(&iter, WRITE, iov, nr_segs, iocb->ki_nbytes);
+		msg.msg_iter = iter;
+		res = sock->ops->aio_sendmsg(iocb, sock, &msg);
+	} else {
+		res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	return res;
+}
+
 /*
  * Atomic setting of ioctl hooks to avoid race
  * with module unload.