| Message ID | 20180420235904.27496-3-mcgrof@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri 20-04-18 16:59:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > thaw_super_locked() was added via commit 08fdc8a0138a ("buffer.c: call > thaw_super during emergency thaw") merged on v4.17 to help with the > ability so that the caller can take charge of handling the s_umount lock, > however, it has left all* of the failure handling including unlocking > lock of s_umount inside thaw_super_locked(). > > This does not make thaw_super_locked() flexible. For instance we may > later want to use it with the abilty to handle unfolding of the locks > ourselves. > > Change thaw_super_locked() to really just be a helper, and let the > callers deal with all the error handling. And do you have use for the new thaw_super_locked()? Because the new semantics with having to deal with deactivate_locked_super() does not seem ideal either so as a standalone cleanup patch it does not look too useful. > This commit introeuces no functional changes. ^^^ introduces Honza > --- > fs/super.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c > index 9d0eb5e20a1f..82bc74a16f06 100644 > --- a/fs/super.c > +++ b/fs/super.c > @@ -937,10 +937,15 @@ void emergency_remount(void) > > static void do_thaw_all_callback(struct super_block *sb) > { > + int error; > + > down_write(&sb->s_umount); > if (sb->s_root && sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) { > emergency_thaw_bdev(sb); > - thaw_super_locked(sb); > + error = thaw_super_locked(sb); > + if (error) > + up_write(&sb->s_umount); > + deactivate_locked_super(sb); > } else { > up_write(&sb->s_umount); > } > @@ -1532,14 +1537,13 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(freeze_super); > > +/* Caller takes the sb->s_umount rw_semaphore lock and handles active count */ > static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) > { > int error; > > - if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) { > - up_write(&sb->s_umount); > + if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) > return -EINVAL; > - } > > if (sb_rdonly(sb)) { > sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; > @@ -1554,7 +1558,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) > printk(KERN_ERR > "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n"); > lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb); > - up_write(&sb->s_umount); > return error; > } > } > @@ -1563,7 +1566,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) > sb_freeze_unlock(sb); > out: > wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen); > - deactivate_locked_super(sb); > return 0; > } > > @@ -1575,7 +1577,18 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) > */ > int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb) > { > + int error; > + > down_write(&sb->s_umount); > - return thaw_super_locked(sb); > + error = thaw_super_locked(sb); > + if (error) { > + up_write(&sb->s_umount); > + goto out; > + } > + > + deactivate_locked_super(sb); > + > +out: > + return error; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_super); > -- > 2.16.3 >
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index 9d0eb5e20a1f..82bc74a16f06 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -937,10 +937,15 @@ void emergency_remount(void) static void do_thaw_all_callback(struct super_block *sb) { + int error; + down_write(&sb->s_umount); if (sb->s_root && sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) { emergency_thaw_bdev(sb); - thaw_super_locked(sb); + error = thaw_super_locked(sb); + if (error) + up_write(&sb->s_umount); + deactivate_locked_super(sb); } else { up_write(&sb->s_umount); } @@ -1532,14 +1537,13 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(freeze_super); +/* Caller takes the sb->s_umount rw_semaphore lock and handles active count */ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) { int error; - if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) { - up_write(&sb->s_umount); + if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) return -EINVAL; - } if (sb_rdonly(sb)) { sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN; @@ -1554,7 +1558,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) printk(KERN_ERR "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n"); lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb); - up_write(&sb->s_umount); return error; } } @@ -1563,7 +1566,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) sb_freeze_unlock(sb); out: wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen); - deactivate_locked_super(sb); return 0; } @@ -1575,7 +1577,18 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb) */ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb) { + int error; + down_write(&sb->s_umount); - return thaw_super_locked(sb); + error = thaw_super_locked(sb); + if (error) { + up_write(&sb->s_umount); + goto out; + } + + deactivate_locked_super(sb); + +out: + return error; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_super);
thaw_super_locked() was added via commit 08fdc8a0138a ("buffer.c: call thaw_super during emergency thaw") merged on v4.17 to help with the ability so that the caller can take charge of handling the s_umount lock, however, it has left all* of the failure handling including unlocking lock of s_umount inside thaw_super_locked(). This does not make thaw_super_locked() flexible. For instance we may later want to use it with the abilty to handle unfolding of the locks ourselves. Change thaw_super_locked() to really just be a helper, and let the callers deal with all the error handling. This commit introeuces no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- fs/super.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)