Message ID | 20200220200632.14075-4-jmoyer@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fstests: fixes for 64k pages and dax | expand |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:06:32PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will > work just fine on any user-specified block size, though. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> > --- > tests/xfs/300 | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300 > index 28608b81..4f1c927a 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/300 > +++ b/tests/xfs/300 > @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 0 4096" $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals >> $seqres.full > cat $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals | attr -s name $SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > > # Fragment the file by writing backwards > +bs=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) > for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do > - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \ > + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=${bs} \ Although the original case won't fail on 64k test. But this change makes more sense. Thanks, Zorro > oflag=direct count=1 conv=notrunc >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > done > > -- > 2.19.1 >
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:06:32PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will >> work just fine on any user-specified block size, though. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> >> --- >> tests/xfs/300 | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300 >> index 28608b81..4f1c927a 100755 >> --- a/tests/xfs/300 >> +++ b/tests/xfs/300 >> @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 0 4096" $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals >> $seqres.full >> cat $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals | attr -s name $SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test >> $seqres.full 2>&1 >> >> # Fragment the file by writing backwards >> +bs=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) >> for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do >> - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \ >> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=${bs} \ > > Although the original case won't fail on 64k test. But this change makes > more sense. It will fail for the case mentioned in the cover letter. That is: MKFS_OPTIONS="-m reflink=0 -b size=65536" MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o dax" on a system with >4k page size (xfs, in this case). Thanks, Jeff
diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300 index 28608b81..4f1c927a 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/300 +++ b/tests/xfs/300 @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 0 4096" $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals >> $seqres.full cat $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals | attr -s name $SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test >> $seqres.full 2>&1 # Fragment the file by writing backwards +bs=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \ + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=${bs} \ oflag=direct count=1 conv=notrunc >> $seqres.full 2>&1 done
The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will work just fine on any user-specified block size, though. Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> --- tests/xfs/300 | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)