Message ID | 20200505095915.11275-13-mszeredi@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | vfs patch queue | expand |
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Parsing "silent" and clearing SB_SILENT makes zero sense. > > Parsing "silent" and setting SB_SILENT would make a bit more sense, but > apparently nobody cares. > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Looksgood, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
diff --git a/fs/fs_context.c b/fs/fs_context.c index 82019569d493..7d5c5dd2b1d5 100644 --- a/fs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/fs_context.c @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static const struct constant_table common_clear_sb_flag[] = { { "nolazytime", SB_LAZYTIME }, { "nomand", SB_MANDLOCK }, { "rw", SB_RDONLY }, - { "silent", SB_SILENT }, { }, };
Parsing "silent" and clearing SB_SILENT makes zero sense. Parsing "silent" and setting SB_SILENT would make a bit more sense, but apparently nobody cares. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> --- fs/fs_context.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)