From patchwork Mon Aug 17 22:04:13 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11719435 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B9C13B1 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA26C2072E for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730165AbgHQWKG (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:10:06 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:60130 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728789AbgHQWJx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:53 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1k7nKB-001qmx-LW; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:09:51 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.int.ebiederm.org) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1k7nKA-0004PB-1o; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:09:51 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, criu@openvz.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Oleg Nesterov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , =?utf-8?q?Da?= =?utf-8?q?niel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , Matthew Wilcox , "J. Bruce Fields" , Matthew Wilcox , Trond Myklebust , Chris Wright , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:04:13 -0500 Message-Id: <20200817220425.9389-5-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.0 In-Reply-To: <87ft8l6ic3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> References: <87ft8l6ic3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1k7nKA-0004PB-1o;;;mid=<20200817220425.9389-5-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19rbO3QE4jZB/c5thWMG71BB86jat5hk8w= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMGappySubj_01,XMNoVowels autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1183 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 9 (0.7%), parse: 1.58 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 11 (0.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.52 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 13 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.03 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.86 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 148 (12.5%), check_bayes: 146 (12.4%), b_tokenize: 8 (0.7%), b_tok_get_all: 10 (0.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 123 (10.4%), b_finish: 0.83 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 979 (82.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.55 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.2%), poll_dns_idle: 0.68 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 4.2 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 12 (1.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 05/17] bpf: In bpf_task_fd_query use fget_task X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Use fget_task to simplify bpf_task_fd_query. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 20 +++----------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 86299a292214..93657d5f6538 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -3741,7 +3741,6 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, pid_t pid = attr->task_fd_query.pid; u32 fd = attr->task_fd_query.fd; const struct perf_event *event; - struct files_struct *files; struct task_struct *task; struct file *file; int err; @@ -3759,23 +3758,11 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, if (!task) return -ENOENT; - files = get_files_struct(task); - put_task_struct(task); - if (!files) - return -ENOENT; - err = 0; - spin_lock(&files->file_lock); - file = fcheck_files(files, fd); + file = fget_task(task, fd); + put_task_struct(task); if (!file) - err = -EBADF; - else - get_file(file); - spin_unlock(&files->file_lock); - put_files_struct(files); - - if (err) - goto out; + return -EBADF; if (file->f_op == &bpf_link_fops) { struct bpf_link *link = file->private_data; @@ -3815,7 +3802,6 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, err = -ENOTSUPP; put_file: fput(file); -out: return err; }