Message ID | 20201027145252.3976138-1-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] seq_file: fix clang warning for NULL pointer arithmetic | expand |
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c > index f277d023ebcd..eafeb8bf4fe4 100644 > --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c > +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c > @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos) > return next; > } else { > /* > - * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Returns > - * !NULL if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, NULL. > + * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Continues > + * if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, EOF. > */ > - return NULL + !*ppos; > + return *ppos ? SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE : SEQ_OPEN_EOF; Why the somewhat obsfucating unary expression instead of a good old if? e.g. return next; } if (*ppos) retun SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE; return NULL; > ++*ppos; > - return NULL; > + return SEQ_OPEN_EOF; I don't think SEQ_OPEN_EOF is all that useful. NULL is the documented end case already. > diff --git a/include/linux/seq_file.h b/include/linux/seq_file.h > index 813614d4b71f..26f0758b6551 100644 > --- a/include/linux/seq_file.h > +++ b/include/linux/seq_file.h > @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ struct seq_operations { > > #define SEQ_SKIP 1 > > +#define SEQ_OPEN_EOF (void *)0 > +#define SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE (void *)1 I think SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE also wants a comment documenting it. AFAICS the reason for it is that ->start needs to return something non-NULL for the seq_file code to make progress, and there is nothing better for the single_open case.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:22 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c > > index f277d023ebcd..eafeb8bf4fe4 100644 > > --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c > > +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c > > @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos) > > return next; > > } else { > > /* > > - * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Returns > > - * !NULL if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, NULL. > > + * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Continues > > + * if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, EOF. > > */ > > - return NULL + !*ppos; > > + return *ppos ? SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE : SEQ_OPEN_EOF; > > Why the somewhat obsfucating unary expression instead of a good > old if? > > e.g. > > return next; > } > if (*ppos) > retun SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE; > return NULL; > > > > ++*ppos; > > - return NULL; > > + return SEQ_OPEN_EOF; > > I don't think SEQ_OPEN_EOF is all that useful. NULL is the documented > end case already. Right, Al already pointed out the same thing on IRC. > > diff --git a/include/linux/seq_file.h b/include/linux/seq_file.h > > index 813614d4b71f..26f0758b6551 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/seq_file.h > > +++ b/include/linux/seq_file.h > > @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ struct seq_operations { > > > > #define SEQ_SKIP 1 > > > > +#define SEQ_OPEN_EOF (void *)0 > > +#define SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE (void *)1 > > I think SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE also wants a comment documenting it. > AFAICS the reason for it is that ->start needs to return something > non-NULL for the seq_file code to make progress, and there is nothing > better for the single_open case. Ok. Arnd
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c index f277d023ebcd..eafeb8bf4fe4 100644 --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos) return next; } else { /* - * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Returns - * !NULL if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, NULL. + * The same behavior and code as single_open(). Continues + * if pos is at the beginning; otherwise, EOF. */ - return NULL + !*ppos; + return *ppos ? SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE : SEQ_OPEN_EOF; } } @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_next(struct seq_file *sf, void *v, loff_t *ppos) * terminate after the initial read. */ ++*ppos; - return NULL; + return SEQ_OPEN_EOF; } } diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c index 31219c1db17d..203cd86136ad 100644 --- a/fs/seq_file.c +++ b/fs/seq_file.c @@ -526,13 +526,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_dentry); static void *single_start(struct seq_file *p, loff_t *pos) { - return NULL + (*pos == 0); + return *pos == 0 ? SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE : SEQ_OPEN_EOF; } static void *single_next(struct seq_file *p, void *v, loff_t *pos) { ++*pos; - return NULL; + return SEQ_OPEN_EOF; } static void single_stop(struct seq_file *p, void *v) diff --git a/include/linux/seq_file.h b/include/linux/seq_file.h index 813614d4b71f..26f0758b6551 100644 --- a/include/linux/seq_file.h +++ b/include/linux/seq_file.h @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ struct seq_operations { #define SEQ_SKIP 1 +#define SEQ_OPEN_EOF (void *)0 +#define SEQ_OPEN_SINGLE (void *)1 + /** * seq_has_overflowed - check if the buffer has overflowed * @m: the seq_file handle