[v3,05/76] mm: list_lru: remove holding lru lock

Commit Message

Muchun Song Sept. 14, 2021, 7:28 a.m. UTC

Since commit e5bc3af7734f ("rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT
synchronize_rcu()"), the critical section of spin lock can serve
as an RCU read-side critical section which already allows readers
that hold nlru->lock avoid taking rcu lock. So just to remove
holding lock.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[e-mail]>
---
 mm/list_lru.c | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 4962d48d4410..6b2f3cbe5f67 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -402,18 +402,7 @@  static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru,
 	}
 
 	memcpy(&new->lru, &old->lru, old_size * sizeof(void *));
-
-	/*
-	 * The locking below allows readers that hold nlru->lock avoid taking
-	 * rcu_read_lock (see list_lru_from_memcg_idx).
-	 *
-	 * Since list_lru_{add,del} may be called under an IRQ-safe lock,
-	 * we have to use IRQ-safe primitives here to avoid deadlock.
-	 */
-	spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);
-
 	kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
 	return 0;
 }