@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/task_work.h>
#include <linux/ima.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
@@ -119,8 +120,11 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_stat_sysctls[] = {
static int __init init_fs_stat_sysctls(void)
{
register_sysctl_init("fs", fs_stat_sysctls);
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC))
- register_sysctl_mount_point("fs/binfmt_misc");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC)) {
+ struct ctl_table_header *hdr;
+ hdr = register_sysctl_mount_point("fs/binfmt_misc");
+ kmemleak_not_leak(hdr);
+ }
return 0;
}
fs_initcall(init_fs_stat_sysctls);
Commit b42bc9a3c511 ("Fix regression due to "fs: move binfmt_misc sysctl to its own file") fixed a regression, however it failed to add a kmemleak_not_leak(). Fixes: b42bc9a3c511 ("Fix regression due to "fs: move binfmt_misc sysctl to its own file") Reported-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com> Cc: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- The fix for the regression was applied before we could say Satoshi Nakamoto, and so it failed to carry the little tidbit of using kmemleak_not_leak() to avoid the false positive splat. Fix this. fs/file_table.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)