From patchwork Thu Sep 1 13:35:02 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhang Yi X-Patchwork-Id: 12962585 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7729ECAAD3 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234461AbiIANYp (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:24:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32818 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234022AbiIANYO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:24:14 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D713C2BB12; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MJMBr1WRNznTwj; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:21:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:24:07 +0800 From: Zhang Yi To: , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block() Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:35:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20220901133505.2510834-12-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> References: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- fs/ufs/balloc.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c index bd810d8239f2..2436e3f82147 100644 --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c @@ -295,14 +295,10 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg, if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos); - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); - wait_on_buffer(bh); - if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { - ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, - "read of block failed\n"); - break; - } + if (bh_read(bh, 0) < 0) { + ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, + "read of block failed\n"); + break; } UFSD(" change from %llu to %llu, pos %u\n",