Message ID | 20220920193632.2215598-10-mszeredi@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fuse tmpfile | expand |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:36:32PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This is basically equivalent to the FUSE_CREATE operation which creates and > opens a regular file. > > Add a new FUSE_TMPFILE operation, otherwise just reuse the protocol and the > code for FUSE_CREATE. > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> > --- > fs/fuse/dir.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++ > include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 6 +++++- > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c > index b585b04e815e..01b2d5c5a64a 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static int get_security_context(struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, > */ > static int fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, > struct file *file, unsigned int flags, > - umode_t mode) > + umode_t mode, u32 opcode) > { > int err; > struct inode *inode; > @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static int fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, > inarg.open_flags |= FUSE_OPEN_KILL_SUIDGID; > } > > - args.opcode = FUSE_CREATE; > + args.opcode = opcode; > args.nodeid = get_node_id(dir); > args.in_numargs = 2; > args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg); > @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ static int fuse_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, > if (fc->no_create) > goto mknod; > > - err = fuse_create_open(dir, entry, file, flags, mode); > + err = fuse_create_open(dir, entry, file, flags, mode, FUSE_CREATE); > if (err == -ENOSYS) { > fc->no_create = 1; > goto mknod; > @@ -802,6 +802,24 @@ static int fuse_create(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, > return fuse_mknod(&init_user_ns, dir, entry, mode, 0); > } > > +static int fuse_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, > + struct file *file, umode_t mode) > +{ > + struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(dir); > + int err; > + > + if (fc->no_tmpfile) > + goto no_tmpfile; > + > + err = fuse_create_open(dir, file->f_path.dentry, file, file->f_flags, mode, FUSE_TMPFILE); > + if (err == -ENOSYS) { > + fc->no_tmpfile = 1; > +no_tmpfile: > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + return err; > +} Hm, seems like this could avoid the goto into an if-block: static int fuse_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, struct file *file, umode_t mode) { struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(dir); int err; if (fc->no_tmpfile) return -EOPNOTSUPP; err = fuse_create_open(dir, file->f_path.dentry, file, file->f_flags, mode, FUSE_TMPFILE); if (err == -ENOSYS) { fc->no_tmpfile = 1; err = -EOPNOTSUPP; } return err; } > + > static int fuse_mkdir(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, > struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode) > { > @@ -1913,6 +1931,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations fuse_dir_inode_operations = { > .setattr = fuse_setattr, > .create = fuse_create, > .atomic_open = fuse_atomic_open, > + .tmpfile = fuse_tmpfile, > .mknod = fuse_mknod, > .permission = fuse_permission, > .getattr = fuse_getattr, > diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > index 488b460e046f..98a9cf531873 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > @@ -784,6 +784,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { > /* Does the filesystem support per inode DAX? */ > unsigned int inode_dax:1; > > + /* Is tmpfile not implemented by fs? */ > + unsigned int no_tmpfile:1; Just a nit, it might be nicer to turn this into a positive, i.e., unsigned int has_tmpfile:1. Easier to understand as people usually aren't great at processing negations. > + > /** The number of requests waiting for completion */ > atomic_t num_waiting; > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h > index d6ccee961891..76ee8f9e024a 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h > @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ > * - add FUSE_SECURITY_CTX init flag > * - add security context to create, mkdir, symlink, and mknod requests > * - add FUSE_HAS_INODE_DAX, FUSE_ATTR_DAX > + * > + * 7.37 > + * - add FUSE_TMPFILE > */ > > #ifndef _LINUX_FUSE_H > @@ -229,7 +232,7 @@ > #define FUSE_KERNEL_VERSION 7 > > /** Minor version number of this interface */ > -#define FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION 36 > +#define FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION 37 > > /** The node ID of the root inode */ > #define FUSE_ROOT_ID 1 > @@ -537,6 +540,7 @@ enum fuse_opcode { > FUSE_SETUPMAPPING = 48, > FUSE_REMOVEMAPPING = 49, > FUSE_SYNCFS = 50, > + FUSE_TMPFILE = 51, > > /* CUSE specific operations */ > CUSE_INIT = 4096, > -- > 2.37.3 >
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 11:17, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hm, seems like this could avoid the goto into an if-block: > > static int fuse_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, > struct file *file, umode_t mode) > { > struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(dir); > int err; > > if (fc->no_tmpfile) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > err = fuse_create_open(dir, file->f_path.dentry, file, file->f_flags, mode, FUSE_TMPFILE); > if (err == -ENOSYS) { > fc->no_tmpfile = 1; > err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > return err; > } Okay. > > + > > static int fuse_mkdir(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, > > struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode) > > { > > @@ -1913,6 +1931,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations fuse_dir_inode_operations = { > > .setattr = fuse_setattr, > > .create = fuse_create, > > .atomic_open = fuse_atomic_open, > > + .tmpfile = fuse_tmpfile, > > .mknod = fuse_mknod, > > .permission = fuse_permission, > > .getattr = fuse_getattr, > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > > index 488b460e046f..98a9cf531873 100644 > > --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > > +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h > > @@ -784,6 +784,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { > > /* Does the filesystem support per inode DAX? */ > > unsigned int inode_dax:1; > > > > + /* Is tmpfile not implemented by fs? */ > > + unsigned int no_tmpfile:1; > > Just a nit, it might be nicer to turn this into a positive, i.e., > unsigned int has_tmpfile:1. Easier to understand as people usually > aren't great at processing negations. Fuse has zillions of these no_foobar flags. Turning this single one into a positive would be much more confusing IMO. Thanks, Miklos
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c index b585b04e815e..01b2d5c5a64a 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static int get_security_context(struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, */ static int fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, struct file *file, unsigned int flags, - umode_t mode) + umode_t mode, u32 opcode) { int err; struct inode *inode; @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static int fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, inarg.open_flags |= FUSE_OPEN_KILL_SUIDGID; } - args.opcode = FUSE_CREATE; + args.opcode = opcode; args.nodeid = get_node_id(dir); args.in_numargs = 2; args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg); @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ static int fuse_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, if (fc->no_create) goto mknod; - err = fuse_create_open(dir, entry, file, flags, mode); + err = fuse_create_open(dir, entry, file, flags, mode, FUSE_CREATE); if (err == -ENOSYS) { fc->no_create = 1; goto mknod; @@ -802,6 +802,24 @@ static int fuse_create(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, return fuse_mknod(&init_user_ns, dir, entry, mode, 0); } +static int fuse_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, + struct file *file, umode_t mode) +{ + struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(dir); + int err; + + if (fc->no_tmpfile) + goto no_tmpfile; + + err = fuse_create_open(dir, file->f_path.dentry, file, file->f_flags, mode, FUSE_TMPFILE); + if (err == -ENOSYS) { + fc->no_tmpfile = 1; +no_tmpfile: + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + return err; +} + static int fuse_mkdir(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode) { @@ -1913,6 +1931,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations fuse_dir_inode_operations = { .setattr = fuse_setattr, .create = fuse_create, .atomic_open = fuse_atomic_open, + .tmpfile = fuse_tmpfile, .mknod = fuse_mknod, .permission = fuse_permission, .getattr = fuse_getattr, diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h index 488b460e046f..98a9cf531873 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h @@ -784,6 +784,9 @@ struct fuse_conn { /* Does the filesystem support per inode DAX? */ unsigned int inode_dax:1; + /* Is tmpfile not implemented by fs? */ + unsigned int no_tmpfile:1; + /** The number of requests waiting for completion */ atomic_t num_waiting; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h index d6ccee961891..76ee8f9e024a 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fuse.h @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ * - add FUSE_SECURITY_CTX init flag * - add security context to create, mkdir, symlink, and mknod requests * - add FUSE_HAS_INODE_DAX, FUSE_ATTR_DAX + * + * 7.37 + * - add FUSE_TMPFILE */ #ifndef _LINUX_FUSE_H @@ -229,7 +232,7 @@ #define FUSE_KERNEL_VERSION 7 /** Minor version number of this interface */ -#define FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION 36 +#define FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION 37 /** The node ID of the root inode */ #define FUSE_ROOT_ID 1 @@ -537,6 +540,7 @@ enum fuse_opcode { FUSE_SETUPMAPPING = 48, FUSE_REMOVEMAPPING = 49, FUSE_SYNCFS = 50, + FUSE_TMPFILE = 51, /* CUSE specific operations */ CUSE_INIT = 4096,
This is basically equivalent to the FUSE_CREATE operation which creates and opens a regular file. Add a new FUSE_TMPFILE operation, otherwise just reuse the protocol and the code for FUSE_CREATE. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> --- fs/fuse/dir.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++ include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 6 +++++- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)