| Message ID | 20221222101612.18814-6-jack@suse.cz (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | udf: Couple more fixes for extent and directory handling | expand |
diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c index fe5b0ba600fa..075e0a9d766c 100644 --- a/fs/udf/inode.c +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void udf_do_extend_final_block(struct inode *inode, */ if (new_elen <= (last_ext->extLength & UDF_EXTENT_LENGTH_MASK)) return; - added_bytes = (last_ext->extLength & UDF_EXTENT_LENGTH_MASK) - new_elen; + added_bytes = new_elen - (last_ext->extLength & UDF_EXTENT_LENGTH_MASK); last_ext->extLength += added_bytes; UDF_I(inode)->i_lenExtents += added_bytes;
When extending the last extent in the file within the last block, we wrongly computed the length of the last extent. This is mostly a cosmetical problem since the extent does not contain any data and the length will be fixed up by following operations but still. Fixes: 1f3868f06855 ("udf: Fix extending file within last block") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)