@@ -1166,18 +1166,16 @@ static struct ctl_table_header *new_links(struct ctl_dir *dir, struct ctl_table_
struct ctl_table_header *links;
struct ctl_node *node;
char *link_name;
- int nr_entries, name_bytes;
+ int name_bytes;
name_bytes = 0;
- nr_entries = 0;
list_for_each_table_entry(entry, head) {
- nr_entries++;
name_bytes += strlen(entry->procname) + 1;
}
links = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ctl_table_header) +
- sizeof(struct ctl_node)*nr_entries +
- sizeof(struct ctl_table)*(nr_entries + 1) +
+ sizeof(struct ctl_node)*head->ctl_table_size +
+ sizeof(struct ctl_table)*(head->ctl_table_size + 1) +
name_bytes,
GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1185,8 +1183,8 @@ static struct ctl_table_header *new_links(struct ctl_dir *dir, struct ctl_table_
return NULL;
node = (struct ctl_node *)(links + 1);
- link_table = (struct ctl_table *)(node + nr_entries);
- link_name = (char *)&link_table[nr_entries + 1];
+ link_table = (struct ctl_table *)(node + head->ctl_table_size);
+ link_name = (char *)&link_table[head->ctl_table_size + 1];
link = link_table;
list_for_each_table_entry(entry, head) {
@@ -1200,7 +1198,7 @@ static struct ctl_table_header *new_links(struct ctl_dir *dir, struct ctl_table_
}
init_header(links, dir->header.root, dir->header.set, node, link_table,
head->ctl_table_size);
- links->nreg = nr_entries;
+ links->nreg = head->ctl_table_size;
return links;
}
Now that the number of entries is set in the ctl_header struct, there is no need to calculate that number. Replace the variable and logic that does the calculation whith the ctl_header value. Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com> --- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)