From patchwork Mon Nov 27 06:22:51 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 13469100 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378291BD; Sun, 26 Nov 2023 22:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SdwWs5771z4f3khb; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:23:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E5F1A112A; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:23:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgBXWhDeNWRlxeA8CA--.60190S9; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:23:38 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: hch@infradead.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, roger.pau@citrix.com, colyli@suse.de, kent.overstreet@gmail.com, joern@lazybastard.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, sth@linux.ibm.com, hoeppner@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, nico@fluxnic.net, xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, agruenba@redhat.com, jack@suse.com, konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com, dchinner@redhat.com, linux@weissschuh.net, min15.li@samsung.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, dlemoal@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hare@suse.de, p.raghav@samsung.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH block/for-next v2 15/16] buffer: use new helper to get inode from block_device Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:22:51 +0800 Message-Id: <20231127062252.2367645-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20231127062252.2367645-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20231127062252.2367645-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgBXWhDeNWRlxeA8CA--.60190S9 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJF13Xry3Zr4rKw1xKryxGrg_yoW5XFWxpF 9IkFW3G3ykWryFgay0yws0qr9Ig3W2gay8u3yxJ3sxArW0gF92qF10kr12vFWayrW0yrWj qF42krWrury2gFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPY14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYI kIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2 z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s 1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l e2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI 8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwAC jcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0x kIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AK xVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26rWY6r4UJwCIc4 0Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j6ryUMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AK xVWxJr0_GcWlIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F 4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUArcfU UUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ From: Yu Kuai Which is more efficiency, and also prepare to remove the field 'bd_inode' from block_device. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- fs/buffer.c | 8 ++++---- include/linux/buffer_head.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index 967f34b70aa8..bf993198f881 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_buffer_write_sync); static struct buffer_head * __find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block) { - struct inode *bd_inode = bdev->bd_inode; + struct inode *bd_inode = bdev_inode(bdev); struct address_space *bd_mapping = bd_inode->i_mapping; struct buffer_head *ret = NULL; pgoff_t index; @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static int grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits, gfp_t gfp) { - struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode; + struct inode *inode = bdev_inode(bdev); struct folio *folio; struct buffer_head *bh; sector_t end_block; @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ __bread_gfp(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, { struct buffer_head *bh; - gfp |= mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); + gfp |= mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev_inode(bdev)->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); /* * Prefer looping in the allocator rather than here, at least that @@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(create_empty_buffers); */ void clean_bdev_aliases(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, sector_t len) { - struct inode *bd_inode = bdev->bd_inode; + struct inode *bd_inode = bdev_inode(bdev); struct address_space *bd_mapping = bd_inode->i_mapping; struct folio_batch fbatch; pgoff_t index = block >> (PAGE_SHIFT - bd_inode->i_blkbits); diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h index 5f23ee599889..da9ee62e3aa9 100644 --- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h +++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static inline struct buffer_head *getblk_unmovable(struct block_device *bdev, { gfp_t gfp; - gfp = mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); + gfp = mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev_inode(bdev)->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL; return bdev_getblk(bdev, block, size, gfp); @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static inline struct buffer_head *__getblk(struct block_device *bdev, { gfp_t gfp; - gfp = mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); + gfp = mapping_gfp_constraint(bdev_inode(bdev)->i_mapping, ~__GFP_FS); gfp |= __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_NOFAIL; return bdev_getblk(bdev, block, size, gfp);