Message ID | 20240228091958.288260-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Fixes and cleanups to fs-writeback | expand |
On Wed 28-02-24 17:19:53, Kemeng Shi wrote: > In kupdate writeback, only expired inode (have been dirty for longer than > dirty_expire_interval) is supposed to be written back. However, kupdate > writeback will writeback non-expired inode left in b_io or b_more_io from > last wb_writeback. As a result, writeback will keep being triggered > unexpected when we keep dirtying pages even dirty memory is under > threshold and inode is not expired. To be more specific: > Assume dirty background threshold is > 1G and dirty_expire_centisecs is > > 60s. When we running fio -size=1G -invalidate=0 -ioengine=libaio > --time_based -runtime=60... (keep dirtying), the writeback will keep > being triggered as following: > wb_workfn > wb_do_writeback > wb_check_background_flush > /* > * Wb dirty background threshold starts at 0 if device was idle and > * grows up when bandwidth of wb is updated. So a background > * writeback is triggered. > */ > wb_over_bg_thresh > /* > * Dirtied inode will be written back and added to b_more_io list > * after slice used up (because we keep dirtying the inode). > */ > wb_writeback > > Writeback is triggered per dirty_writeback_centisecs as following: > wb_workfn > wb_do_writeback > wb_check_old_data_flush > /* > * Write back inode left in b_io and b_more_io from last wb_writeback > * even the inode is non-expired and it will be added to b_more_io > * again as slice will be used up (because we keep dirtying the > * inode) > */ > wb_writeback > > Fix this by moving non-expired inode to dirty list instead of more io > list for kupdate writeback in requeue_inode. > > Test as following: > /* make it more easier to observe the issue */ > echo 300000 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs > echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs > /* create a idle device */ > mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/vdb > mount /dev/vdb /bdi1/ > /* run buffer write with fio */ > fio -name test -filename=/bdi1/file -size=800M -ioengine=libaio -bs=4K \ > -iodepth=1 -rw=write -direct=0 --time_based -runtime=60 -invalidate=0 > > Fio result before fix (run three tests): > 1360MB/s > 1329MB/s > 1455MB/s > > Fio result after fix (run three tests): > 1737MB/s > 1729MB/s > 1789MB/s > > Writeback for non-expired inode is gone as expeted. Observe this with trace > writeback_start and writeback_written as following: > echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/writeback/writeback_start/enab > echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/writeback/writeback_written/enable > cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/fs-writeback.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c > index 5ab1aaf805f7..4e6166e07eaf 100644 > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c > @@ -1561,7 +1561,8 @@ static void inode_sleep_on_writeback(struct inode *inode) > * thread's back can have unexpected consequences. > */ > static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, > - struct writeback_control *wbc) > + struct writeback_control *wbc, > + unsigned long dirtied_before) > { > if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) > return; > @@ -1594,7 +1595,8 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, > * We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages() > * sometimes bales out without doing anything. > */ > - if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { > + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0 && > + !inode_dirtied_after(inode, dirtied_before)) { > /* Slice used up. Queue for next turn. */ > requeue_io(inode, wb); > } else { > @@ -1862,6 +1864,11 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, > unsigned long start_time = jiffies; > long write_chunk; > long total_wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */ > + unsigned long dirtied_before = jiffies; > + > + if (work->for_kupdate) > + dirtied_before = jiffies - > + msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10); > > while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) { > struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev); > @@ -1967,7 +1974,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); > if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL)) > total_wrote++; > - requeue_inode(inode, tmp_wb, &wbc); > + requeue_inode(inode, tmp_wb, &wbc, dirtied_before); > inode_sync_complete(inode); > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); > > -- > 2.30.0 >
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 5ab1aaf805f7..4e6166e07eaf 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -1561,7 +1561,8 @@ static void inode_sleep_on_writeback(struct inode *inode) * thread's back can have unexpected consequences. */ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, - struct writeback_control *wbc) + struct writeback_control *wbc, + unsigned long dirtied_before) { if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) return; @@ -1594,7 +1595,8 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, * We didn't write back all the pages. nfs_writepages() * sometimes bales out without doing anything. */ - if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0 && + !inode_dirtied_after(inode, dirtied_before)) { /* Slice used up. Queue for next turn. */ requeue_io(inode, wb); } else { @@ -1862,6 +1864,11 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long start_time = jiffies; long write_chunk; long total_wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */ + unsigned long dirtied_before = jiffies; + + if (work->for_kupdate) + dirtied_before = jiffies - + msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10); while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) { struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev); @@ -1967,7 +1974,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL)) total_wrote++; - requeue_inode(inode, tmp_wb, &wbc); + requeue_inode(inode, tmp_wb, &wbc, dirtied_before); inode_sync_complete(inode); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);