| Message ID | 20240315-dir-deleg-v1-3-a1d6209a3654@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | vfs, nfsd, nfs: implement directory delegations | expand |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:52:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > @@ -4603,9 +4606,12 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct mnt_idmap *idmap, > else if (max_links && inode->i_nlink >= max_links) > error = -EMLINK; > else { > - error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); > - if (!error) > - error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); > + error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); > + if (!error) { > + error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); > + if (!error) > + error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); > + } A minor nit: that might be easier to follow as error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); if (!error) error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); if (!error) error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); and let the compiler deal with optimizing it - any C compiler is going to be able to figure out that one out. vfs_link() is a mix of those styles anyway - we have if (!error && (inode->i_state & I_LINKABLE)) { spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); inode->i_state &= ~I_LINKABLE; spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); } immediately afterwards; might as well make that consistent, especially since you are getting more shallow nesting that way.
On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 23:57 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:52:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > @@ -4603,9 +4606,12 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct mnt_idmap *idmap, > > else if (max_links && inode->i_nlink >= max_links) > > error = -EMLINK; > > else { > > - error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); > > - if (!error) > > - error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); > > + error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); > > + if (!error) { > > + error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); > > + if (!error) > > + error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); > > + } > > A minor nit: that might be easier to follow as > error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); > if (!error) > error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); > if (!error) > error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); > > and let the compiler deal with optimizing it - any C compiler is going to be > able to figure out that one out. vfs_link() is a mix of those styles anyway - > we have > if (!error && (inode->i_state & I_LINKABLE)) { > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); > inode->i_state &= ~I_LINKABLE; > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); > } > immediately afterwards; might as well make that consistent, especially since > you are getting more shallow nesting that way. Sounds good. Fixed in my tree. Thanks for the review so far!
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 9342fa6a38c2..56d3ebed7bac 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -4332,6 +4332,9 @@ int vfs_unlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir, else { error = security_inode_unlink(dir, dentry); if (!error) { + error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); + if (error) + goto out; error = try_break_deleg(target, delegated_inode); if (error) goto out; @@ -4603,9 +4606,12 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct mnt_idmap *idmap, else if (max_links && inode->i_nlink >= max_links) error = -EMLINK; else { - error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); - if (!error) - error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); + error = try_break_deleg(dir, delegated_inode); + if (!error) { + error = try_break_deleg(inode, delegated_inode); + if (!error) + error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry); + } } if (!error && (inode->i_state & I_LINKABLE)) { @@ -4870,6 +4876,14 @@ int vfs_rename(struct renamedata *rd) old_dir->i_nlink >= max_links) goto out; } + error = try_break_deleg(old_dir, delegated_inode); + if (error) + goto out; + if (new_dir != old_dir) { + error = try_break_deleg(new_dir, delegated_inode); + if (error) + goto out; + } if (!is_dir) { error = try_break_deleg(source, delegated_inode); if (error)
In order to add directory delegation support, we need to break delegations on the parent whenever there is going to be a change in the directory. vfs_link, vfs_unlink, and vfs_rename all have existing delegation break handling for the children in the rename. Add the necessary calls for breaking delegations in the parent(s) as well. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> --- fs/namei.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)