@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int fuse_inode_uncached_io_start(struct fuse_inode *fi, struct fuse_backing *fb)
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
/* deny conflicting backing files on same fuse inode */
oldfb = fuse_inode_backing(fi);
- if (oldfb && oldfb != fb) {
+ if (fb && oldfb && oldfb != fb) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int fuse_inode_uncached_io_start(struct fuse_inode *fi, struct fuse_backing *fb)
fi->iocachectr--;
/* fuse inode holds a single refcount of backing file */
- if (!oldfb) {
+ if (fb && !oldfb) {
oldfb = fuse_inode_backing_set(fi, fb);
WARN_ON_ONCE(oldfb != NULL);
} else {
Paralle dio write takes a negative refcount of fi->iocachectr and so does open of file in passthrough mode. The refcount of passthrough mode is associated with attach/detach of a fuse_backing object to fuse inode. For parallel dio write, the backing file is irrelevant, so the call to fuse_inode_uncached_io_start() passes a NULL fuse_backing object. Passing a NULL fuse_backing will result in false -EBUSY error if the file is already open in passthrough mode. Allow taking negative fi->iocachectr refcount with NULL fuse_backing, because it does not conflict with an already attached fuse_backing object. Fixes: 4a90451bbc7f ("fuse: implement open in passthrough mode") Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> --- fs/fuse/iomode.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)