Message ID | 20240801163057.3981192-15-john.g.garry@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | forcealign for xfs | expand |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:30:57PM +0000, John Garry wrote: > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> > > Enable this feature. > > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> You really ought to add your own Reviewed-by tag here... --D > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h > index 95f5259c4255..04c6cbc943c2 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h > @@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ xfs_sb_has_compat_feature( > (XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FINOBT | \ > XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_RMAPBT | \ > XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK| \ > - XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT) > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT | \ > + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN) > #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN ~XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ALL > static inline bool > xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature( > -- > 2.31.1 > >
On 06/08/2024 20:43, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:30:57PM +0000, John Garry wrote: >> From: "Darrick J. Wong"<djwong@kernel.org> >> >> Enable this feature. >> >> Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong"<djwong@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.g.garry@oracle.com> > You really ought to add your own Reviewed-by tag here... ok, if you prefer. Normally I think it's implied by the context and signed-off tag. Thanks, John
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:50:18PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 06/08/2024 20:43, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 04:30:57PM +0000, John Garry wrote: > > > From: "Darrick J. Wong"<djwong@kernel.org> > > > > > > Enable this feature. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong"<djwong@kernel.org> > > > Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.g.garry@oracle.com> > > You really ought to add your own Reviewed-by tag here... > > ok, if you prefer. Normally I think it's implied by the context and > signed-off tag. SoB means only that either you've written the patch yourself and have the right to submit it, or that you have the right to pass on a patch written by someone else who certified the same thing. An actual code review should be signalled explicitly, not implied by context. --D > Thanks, > John >
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h index 95f5259c4255..04c6cbc943c2 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h @@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ xfs_sb_has_compat_feature( (XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FINOBT | \ XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_RMAPBT | \ XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK| \ - XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT) + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT | \ + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN) #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN ~XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ALL static inline bool xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(