mm/page-writeback: Consolidate wb_thresh bumping logic into __wb_calc_thresh

Commit Message

Jim Zhao Nov. 21, 2024, 10:05 a.m. UTC

Address the feedback from "mm/page-writeback: raise wb_thresh to prevent
write blocking with strictlimit"(39ac99852fca98ca44d52716d792dfaf24981f53).
The wb_thresh bumping logic is scattered across wb_position_ratio,
__wb_calc_thresh, and wb_update_dirty_ratelimit. For consistency,
consolidate all wb_thresh bumping logic into __wb_calc_thresh.

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Jim Zhao <[e-mail]>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c | 53 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index d213ead95675..8b13bcb42de3 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -936,26 +936,25 @@  static unsigned long __wb_calc_thresh(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc,
 	wb_min_max_ratio(wb, &wb_min_ratio, &wb_max_ratio);
 
 	wb_thresh += (thresh * wb_min_ratio) / (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
-	wb_max_thresh = thresh * wb_max_ratio / (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
-	if (wb_thresh > wb_max_thresh)
-		wb_thresh = wb_max_thresh;
 
 	/*
-	 * With strictlimit flag, the wb_thresh is treated as
-	 * a hard limit in balance_dirty_pages() and wb_position_ratio().
-	 * It's possible that wb_thresh is close to zero, not because
-	 * the device is slow, but because it has been inactive.
-	 * To prevent occasional writes from being blocked, we raise wb_thresh.
+	 * It's very possible that wb_thresh is close to 0 not because the
+	 * device is slow, but that it has remained inactive for long time.
+	 * Honour such devices a reasonable good (hopefully IO efficient)
+	 * threshold, so that the occasional writes won't be blocked and active
+	 * writes can rampup the threshold quickly.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
-		unsigned long limit = hard_dirty_limit(dom, dtc->thresh);
-		u64 wb_scale_thresh = 0;
-
-		if (limit > dtc->dirty)
-			wb_scale_thresh = (limit - dtc->dirty) / 100;
-		wb_thresh = max(wb_thresh, min(wb_scale_thresh, wb_max_thresh / 4));
+	if (thresh > dtc->dirty) {
+		if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT))
+			wb_thresh = max(wb_thresh, (thresh - dtc->dirty) / 100);
+		else
+			wb_thresh = max(wb_thresh, (thresh - dtc->dirty) / 8);
 	}
 
+	wb_max_thresh = thresh * wb_max_ratio / (100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
+	if (wb_thresh > wb_max_thresh)
+		wb_thresh = wb_max_thresh;
+
 	return wb_thresh;
 }
 
@@ -963,6 +962,7 @@  unsigned long wb_calc_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long thresh)
 {
 	struct dirty_throttle_control gdtc = { GDTC_INIT(wb) };
 
+	domain_dirty_avail(&gdtc, true);
 	return __wb_calc_thresh(&gdtc, thresh);
 }
 
@@ -1139,12 +1139,6 @@  static void wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc)
 	if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
 		long long wb_pos_ratio;
 
-		if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8) {
-			dtc->pos_ratio = min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2,
-					   2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT);
-			return;
-		}
-
 		if (dtc->wb_dirty >= wb_thresh)
 			return;
 
@@ -1215,14 +1209,6 @@  static void wb_position_ratio(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(wb_thresh > dtc->thresh))
 		wb_thresh = dtc->thresh;
-	/*
-	 * It's very possible that wb_thresh is close to 0 not because the
-	 * device is slow, but that it has remained inactive for long time.
-	 * Honour such devices a reasonable good (hopefully IO efficient)
-	 * threshold, so that the occasional writes won't be blocked and active
-	 * writes can rampup the threshold quickly.
-	 */
-	wb_thresh = max(wb_thresh, (limit - dtc->dirty) / 8);
 	/*
 	 * scale global setpoint to wb's:
 	 *	wb_setpoint = setpoint * wb_thresh / thresh
@@ -1478,17 +1464,10 @@  static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc,
 	 * balanced_dirty_ratelimit = task_ratelimit * write_bw / dirty_rate).
 	 * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use wb_dirty as
 	 * "dirty" and wb_setpoint as "setpoint".
-	 *
-	 * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if wb_dirty is low because
-	 * it's possible that wb_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity
-	 * of backing device.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
 		dirty = dtc->wb_dirty;
-		if (dtc->wb_dirty < 8)
-			setpoint = dtc->wb_dirty + 1;
-		else
-			setpoint = (dtc->wb_thresh + dtc->wb_bg_thresh) / 2;
+		setpoint = (dtc->wb_thresh + dtc->wb_bg_thresh) / 2;
 	}
 
 	if (dirty < setpoint) {