From patchwork Tue May 19 00:33:21 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11556595 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8713E1391 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 00:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EF420657 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 00:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726957AbgESAhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 20:37:04 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:45682 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726442AbgESAhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 20:37:04 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqFi-0003xR-52; Mon, 18 May 2020 18:37:02 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jaqFh-0004a3-3C; Mon, 18 May 2020 18:37:01 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Cc: Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Greg Ungerer , Rob Landley , Bernd Edlinger , , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Casey Schaufler , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Andy Lutomirski References: <87h7wujhmz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87sgga6ze4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9l4zyla.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <877dx822er.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:33:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877dx822er.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 18 May 2020 19:29:00 -0500") Message-ID: <874ksczru6.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1jaqFh-0004a3-3C;;;mid=<874ksczru6.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1973r7WyKjyu1LuSucdEGRqDGPfyMVGYww= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,T_TooManySym_02,T_TooManySym_03, T_TooManySym_04,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4986] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_03 6+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_04 7+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ; X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 576 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (1.8%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.6%), parse: 1.04 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 3.1 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 13 (2.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.27 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 70 (12.2%), check_bayes: 69 (12.0%), b_tokenize: 13 (2.3%), b_tok_get_all: 11 (1.9%), b_comp_prob: 3.2 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 38 (6.6%), b_finish: 0.92 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 447 (77.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.66 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.5%), poll_dns_idle: 0.69 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.4 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 13 (2.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] exec/binfmt_script: Don't modify bprm->buf and then return -ENOEXEC X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org The return code -ENOEXEC serves to tell search_binary_handler that it should continue searching for the binfmt to handle a given file. This makes return -ENOEXEC with a bprm->buf that is needed to continue the search problematic. The current binfmt_script manages to escape problems as it closes and clears bprm->file before return -ENOEXEC with bprm->buf modified. This prevents search_binary_handler from looping as it explicitly handles a NULL bprm->file. I plan on moving all of the bprm->file managment into fs/exec.c and out of the binary handlers so this will become a problem. Move closing bprm->file and the test for BINPRM_PATH_INACCESSIBLE down below the last return of -ENOEXEC. Introduce i_sep and i_end to track the end of the first argument and the end of the parameters respectively. Using those, constification of all char * pointers, and the helpers next_terminator and next_non_spacetab guarantee the parameter parsing will not modify bprm->buf. Only modify bprm->buf to terminate the strings i_arg and i_name with '\0' for passing to copy_strings_kernel. When replacing loops with next_non_spacetab and next_terminator care has been take that the logic of the parsing code (short of replacing characters by '\0') remains the same. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- fs/binfmt_script.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/binfmt_script.c b/fs/binfmt_script.c index 8d718d8fd0fe..85e0ef86eb11 100644 --- a/fs/binfmt_script.c +++ b/fs/binfmt_script.c @@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ #include static inline bool spacetab(char c) { return c == ' ' || c == '\t'; } -static inline char *next_non_spacetab(char *first, const char *last) +static inline const char *next_non_spacetab(const char *first, const char *last) { for (; first <= last; first++) if (!spacetab(*first)) return first; return NULL; } -static inline char *next_terminator(char *first, const char *last) +static inline const char *next_terminator(const char *first, const char *last) { for (; first <= last; first++) if (spacetab(*first) || !*first) @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@ static inline char *next_terminator(char *first, const char *last) static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) { - const char *i_arg, *i_name; - char *cp, *buf_end; + const char *i_name, *i_sep, *i_arg, *i_end, *buf_end; struct file *file; int retval; @@ -42,20 +41,6 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if ((bprm->buf[0] != '#') || (bprm->buf[1] != '!')) return -ENOEXEC; - /* - * If the script filename will be inaccessible after exec, typically - * because it is a "/dev/fd//.." path against an O_CLOEXEC fd, give - * up now (on the assumption that the interpreter will want to load - * this file). - */ - if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PATH_INACCESSIBLE) - return -ENOENT; - - /* Release since we are not mapping a binary into memory. */ - allow_write_access(bprm->file); - fput(bprm->file); - bprm->file = NULL; - /* * This section handles parsing the #! line into separate * interpreter path and argument strings. We must be careful @@ -71,39 +56,48 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) * parse them on its own. */ buf_end = bprm->buf + sizeof(bprm->buf) - 1; - cp = strnchr(bprm->buf, sizeof(bprm->buf), '\n'); - if (!cp) { - cp = next_non_spacetab(bprm->buf + 2, buf_end); - if (!cp) + i_end = strnchr(bprm->buf, sizeof(bprm->buf), '\n'); + if (!i_end) { + i_end = next_non_spacetab(bprm->buf + 2, buf_end); + if (!i_end) return -ENOEXEC; /* Entire buf is spaces/tabs */ /* * If there is no later space/tab/NUL we must assume the * interpreter path is truncated. */ - if (!next_terminator(cp, buf_end)) + if (!next_terminator(i_end, buf_end)) return -ENOEXEC; - cp = buf_end; + i_end = buf_end; } - /* NUL-terminate the buffer and any trailing spaces/tabs. */ - *cp = '\0'; - while (cp > bprm->buf) { - cp--; - if ((*cp == ' ') || (*cp == '\t')) - *cp = '\0'; - else - break; - } - for (cp = bprm->buf+2; (*cp == ' ') || (*cp == '\t'); cp++); - if (*cp == '\0') + /* Trim any trailing spaces/tabs from i_end */ + while (spacetab(i_end[-1])) + i_end--; + + /* Skip over leading spaces/tabs */ + i_name = next_non_spacetab(bprm->buf+2, i_end); + if (!i_name || (i_name == i_end)) return -ENOEXEC; /* No interpreter name found */ - i_name = cp; + + /* Is there an optional argument? */ i_arg = NULL; - for ( ; *cp && (*cp != ' ') && (*cp != '\t'); cp++) - /* nothing */ ; - while ((*cp == ' ') || (*cp == '\t')) - *cp++ = '\0'; - if (*cp) - i_arg = cp; + i_sep = next_terminator(i_name, i_end); + if (i_sep && (*i_sep != '\0')) + i_arg = next_non_spacetab(i_sep, i_end); + + /* + * If the script filename will be inaccessible after exec, typically + * because it is a "/dev/fd//.." path against an O_CLOEXEC fd, give + * up now (on the assumption that the interpreter will want to load + * this file). + */ + if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PATH_INACCESSIBLE) + return -ENOENT; + + /* Release since we are not mapping a binary into memory. */ + allow_write_access(bprm->file); + fput(bprm->file); + bprm->file = NULL; + /* * OK, we've parsed out the interpreter name and * (optional) argument. @@ -121,7 +115,9 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm) if (retval < 0) return retval; bprm->argc++; + *((char *)i_end) = '\0'; if (i_arg) { + *((char *)i_sep) = '\0'; retval = copy_strings_kernel(1, &i_arg, bprm); if (retval < 0) return retval;