From patchwork Mon Feb 24 16:28:52 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11400969 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548D2924 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344B020CC7 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727957AbgBXQa4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:30:56 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:48116 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727177AbgBXQa4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:30:56 -0500 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6GdD-0004pD-Gh; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:30:55 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1j6GdC-0008NS-PR; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:30:55 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:28:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <878sks0x17.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6GdC-0008NS-PR;;;mid=<878sks0x17.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/NfwOWxBX9r3Z8pi4MDRB4DTaiQmzw4s0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4979] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=91] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=91 X-Spam-Combo: ;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 245 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.6 (1.1%), b_tie_ro: 1.81 (0.7%), parse: 1.25 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (6.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.56 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (7.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.56 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.24 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 28 (11.3%), check_bayes: 26 (10.8%), b_tokenize: 7 (3.0%), b_tok_get_all: 11 (4.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.9%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.5 (1.8%), b_finish: 0.62 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 164 (67.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.49 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.3 (0.9%), poll_dns_idle: 0.79 (0.3%), tests_pri_10: 1.79 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 7 (2.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] proc: Clear the pieces of proc_inode that proc_evict_inode cares about X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org This just keeps everything tidier, and allows for using flags like SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU where slabs are not always cleared before reuse. I don't see reuse without reinitializing happening with the proc_inode but I had a false alarm while reworking flushing of proc dentries and indoes when a process dies that caused me to tidy this up. The code is a little easier to follow and reason about this way so I figured the changes might as well be kept. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index ba6acd300ce1..d9243b24554a 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -33,21 +33,27 @@ static void proc_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) { struct proc_dir_entry *de; struct ctl_table_header *head; + struct proc_inode *ei = PROC_I(inode); truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data); clear_inode(inode); /* Stop tracking associated processes */ - put_pid(PROC_I(inode)->pid); + if (ei->pid) { + put_pid(ei->pid); + ei->pid = NULL; + } /* Let go of any associated proc directory entry */ - de = PDE(inode); - if (de) + de = ei->pde; + if (de) { pde_put(de); + ei->pde = NULL; + } - head = PROC_I(inode)->sysctl; + head = ei->sysctl; if (head) { - RCU_INIT_POINTER(PROC_I(inode)->sysctl, NULL); + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ei->sysctl, NULL); proc_sys_evict_inode(inode, head); } }