From patchwork Fri May 8 18:44:46 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Eric W. Biederman" X-Patchwork-Id: 11537441 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E94914B4 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F53F207DD for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727783AbgEHSsP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 14:48:15 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:54346 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726756AbgEHSsP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 14:48:15 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX82g-0005OS-CG; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:48:14 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jX82f-0004Z3-Fu; Fri, 08 May 2020 12:48:14 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Cc: Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Greg Ungerer , Rob Landley , Bernd Edlinger , , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton References: <87h7wujhmz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87sgga6ze4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:44:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sgga6ze4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 08 May 2020 13:43:31 -0500") Message-ID: <87h7wq6zc1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1jX82f-0004Z3-Fu;;;mid=<87h7wq6zc1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18I4XqN+zQietoOeTu38q9Y+IWIWtiZyE0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **; X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 474 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 16 (3.4%), b_tie_ro: 15 (3.1%), parse: 1.29 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 17 (3.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.16 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 20 (4.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.77 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.45 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 183 (38.7%), check_bayes: 181 (38.2%), b_tokenize: 8 (1.6%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 3.2 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 159 (33.6%), b_finish: 1.00 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 215 (45.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.80 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.8 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 0.56 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.3 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 10 (2.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- fs/exec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec) * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised - * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below). + * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below). */ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) {