diff mbox

[10/11] fuse: Allow user namespace mounts

Message ID a26103156b3f6ba73b1e46c6f577f1bee74872d9.1512041070.git.dongsu@kinvolk.io (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Dongsu Park Dec. 22, 2017, 2:32 p.m. UTC
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>

To be able to mount fuse from non-init user namespaces, it's necessary
to set FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag to fs_flags.

Patch v4 is available: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8944681/

Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
[dongsu: add a simple commit messasge]
Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
---
 fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Serge E. Hallyn Dec. 23, 2017, 3:51 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 03:32:34PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> 
> To be able to mount fuse from non-init user namespaces, it's necessary
> to set FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag to fs_flags.
> 
> Patch v4 is available: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8944681/
> 
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> [dongsu: add a simple commit messasge]
> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>

Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>

> ---
>  fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index 7f6b2e55..8c98edee 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct super_block *sb)
>  static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.name		= "fuse",
> -	.fs_flags	= FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> +	.fs_flags	= FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>  	.mount		= fuse_mount,
>  	.kill_sb	= fuse_kill_sb_anon,
>  };
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = {
>  	.name		= "fuseblk",
>  	.mount		= fuse_mount_blk,
>  	.kill_sb	= fuse_kill_sb_blk,
> -	.fs_flags	= FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> +	.fs_flags	= FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>  };
>  MODULE_ALIAS_FS("fuseblk");
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Miklos Szeredi Feb. 14, 2018, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io> wrote:
> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
>
> To be able to mount fuse from non-init user namespaces, it's necessary
> to set FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag to fs_flags.
>
> Patch v4 is available: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8944681/
>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> [dongsu: add a simple commit messasge]
> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index 7f6b2e55..8c98edee 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct super_block *sb)
>  static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
>         .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>         .name           = "fuse",
> -       .fs_flags       = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> +       .fs_flags       = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>         .mount          = fuse_mount,
>         .kill_sb        = fuse_kill_sb_anon,
>  };

I think enabling FS_USERNS_MOUNT should be pretty safe.

I was thinking opting out should be as simple as "chmod o-rw
/dev/fuse".  But that breaks libfuse, even though fusermount opens
/dev/fuse in privileged mode, so it shouldn't.  That can be fixed in
libfuse, but it's an unfortunate bug and it also means /dev/fuse is
configured with "crw-rw-rw-" in most cases.  Which means it will be
opting out, not opting in, which is the less safe version.

> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = {
>         .name           = "fuseblk",
>         .mount          = fuse_mount_blk,
>         .kill_sb        = fuse_kill_sb_blk,
> -       .fs_flags       = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> +       .fs_flags       = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>  };
>  MODULE_ALIAS_FS("fuseblk");

As I said, this hunk should be dropped from the first version, because
it's possibly unsafe.

Thanks,
Miklos
Miklos Szeredi Feb. 15, 2018, 8:46 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io> wrote:
>> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
>>
>> To be able to mount fuse from non-init user namespaces, it's necessary
>> to set FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag to fs_flags.
>>
>> Patch v4 is available: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8944681/
>>
>> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
>> [dongsu: add a simple commit messasge]
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
>> ---
>>  fs/fuse/inode.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
>> index 7f6b2e55..8c98edee 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
>> @@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct super_block *sb)
>>  static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
>>         .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>>         .name           = "fuse",
>> -       .fs_flags       = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
>> +       .fs_flags       = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>>         .mount          = fuse_mount,
>>         .kill_sb        = fuse_kill_sb_anon,
>>  };
>
> I think enabling FS_USERNS_MOUNT should be pretty safe.
>
> I was thinking opting out should be as simple as "chmod o-rw
> /dev/fuse".  But that breaks libfuse, even though fusermount opens
> /dev/fuse in privileged mode, so it shouldn't.

I'm talking rubbish, /dev/fuse is opened without privs in fusermount as well.

So there's not way to differentiate user_ns unpriv mounts from suid
fusermount unpriv mounts.

Maybe that's just as well...

Thanks,
Miklos
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index 7f6b2e55..8c98edee 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@  static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct super_block *sb)
 static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
 	.name		= "fuse",
-	.fs_flags	= FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
+	.fs_flags	= FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
 	.mount		= fuse_mount,
 	.kill_sb	= fuse_kill_sb_anon,
 };
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@  static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = {
 	.name		= "fuseblk",
 	.mount		= fuse_mount_blk,
 	.kill_sb	= fuse_kill_sb_blk,
-	.fs_flags	= FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
+	.fs_flags	= FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE | FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
 };
 MODULE_ALIAS_FS("fuseblk");