@@ -991,8 +991,7 @@ static inline void __set_page_dirty(struct page *page,
{
__folio_mark_dirty(page_folio(page), mapping, warn);
}
-void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
- struct bdi_writeback *wb);
+void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct bdi_writeback *wb);
void __folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio);
static inline void folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio)
{
@@ -193,16 +193,20 @@ static void filemap_unaccount_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
/*
* At this point folio must be either written or cleaned by
* truncate. Dirty folio here signals a bug and loss of
- * unwritten data.
+ * unwritten data - on ordinary filesystems.
*
- * This fixes dirty accounting after removing the folio entirely
+ * But it's harmless on in-memory filesystems like tmpfs; and can
+ * occur when a driver which did get_user_pages() sets page dirty
+ * before putting it, while the inode is being finally evicted.
+ *
+ * Below fixes dirty accounting after removing the folio entirely
* but leaves the dirty flag set: it has no effect for truncated
* folio and anyway will be cleared before returning folio to
* buddy allocator.
*/
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_dirty(folio)))
- folio_account_cleaned(folio, mapping,
- inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_dirty(folio) &&
+ mapping_can_writeback(mapping)))
+ folio_account_cleaned(folio, inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
}
/*
@@ -2548,16 +2548,14 @@ static void folio_account_dirtied(struct folio *folio,
*
* Caller must hold lock_page_memcg().
*/
-void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
- struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
- if (mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) {
- long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_DIRTY, -nr);
- zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING, -nr);
- wb_stat_mod(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE, -nr);
- task_io_account_cancelled_write(nr * PAGE_SIZE);
- }
+ long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_DIRTY, -nr);
+ zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING, -nr);
+ wb_stat_mod(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE, -nr);
+ task_io_account_cancelled_write(nr * PAGE_SIZE);
}
/*
@@ -2768,7 +2766,7 @@ void __folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio)
wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie);
if (folio_test_clear_dirty(folio))
- folio_account_cleaned(folio, mapping, wb);
+ folio_account_cleaned(folio, wb);
unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie);
folio_memcg_unlock(folio);
filemap_unaccount_folio() has a WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_dirty(folio)). It is good to warn of late dirtying on a persistent filesystem, but late dirtying on tmpfs can only lose data which is expected to be thrown away; and it's a pity if that warning comes ONCE on tmpfs, then hides others which really matter. Make it conditional on mapping_cap_writeback(). Cleanup: then folio_account_cleaned() no longer needs to check that for itself, and so no longer needs to know the mapping. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> --- include/linux/pagemap.h | 3 +-- mm/filemap.c | 14 +++++++++----- mm/page-writeback.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)