Message ID | 20170224131313.953-3-javier@osg.samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c b/drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c index bbe3a5c5b3f5..a557b46dbe8e 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c @@ -546,10 +546,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id adc128_id[] = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, adc128_id); +static const struct of_device_id adc128_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,adc128d818" }, + { }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc128_of_match); + static struct i2c_driver adc128_driver = { .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON, .driver = { .name = "adc128d818", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match), }, .probe = adc128_probe, .remove = adc128_remove,
The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>. But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> --- drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)