Message ID | 20231207210723.222552-1-W_Armin@gmx.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | hwmon: (corsair-psu) Fix probe when built-in | expand |
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:07:23 +0100 Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrote: > It seems that when the driver is built-in, the HID bus is > initialized after the driver is loaded, which whould cause > module_hid_driver() to fail. > Fix this by registering the driver after the HID bus using > late_initcall() in accordance with other hwmon HID drivers. > > Compile-tested only. So you did not test this? Well, I did. [ 2.225831] Driver 'corsair-psu' was unable to register with bus_type 'hid' because the bus was not initialized. [ 2.225835] amd_pstate: driver load is disabled, boot with specific mode to enable this [ 2.226363] ledtrig-cpu: registered to indicate activity on CPUs [ 2.226679] hid: raw HID events driver (C) Jiri Kosina You are right, it is a timing issue and this can actually happen. I'm fine with the fix. Though, this could even be a bigger issue. There are currently 104 HID drivers using the module_hid_driver macro. Maybe it would be a better idea to change the module_hid_driver macro to use the lateinit calls instead of the plain init/exit calls. greetings, Will > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> > --- > drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > index 904890598c11..2c7c92272fe3 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > @@ -899,7 +899,23 @@ static struct hid_driver corsairpsu_driver = { > .reset_resume = corsairpsu_resume, > #endif > }; > -module_hid_driver(corsairpsu_driver); > + > +static int __init corsair_init(void) > +{ > + return hid_register_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); > +} > + > +static void __exit corsair_exit(void) > +{ > + hid_unregister_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); > +} > + > +/* > + * With module_init() the driver would load before the HID bus when > + * built-in, so use late_initcall() instead. > + */ > +late_initcall(corsair_init); > +module_exit(corsair_exit); > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>"); > -- > 2.39.2 >
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:07:23PM +0100, Armin Wolf wrote: > It seems that when the driver is built-in, the HID bus is > initialized after the driver is loaded, which whould cause > module_hid_driver() to fail. > Fix this by registering the driver after the HID bus using > late_initcall() in accordance with other hwmon HID drivers. > > Compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Applied. I dropped the "Compile-tested only" comment and added a note that the patch was tested but the tested did not provide a Tested-by: tag. Thanks, Guenter
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:07:23 +0100 Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrote: Just forgot. Did both, works just fine. Is it okay that way? This is my first time. Tested-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net> Reviewed-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net> > It seems that when the driver is built-in, the HID bus is > initialized after the driver is loaded, which whould cause > module_hid_driver() to fail. > Fix this by registering the driver after the HID bus using > late_initcall() in accordance with other hwmon HID drivers. > > Compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> > --- > drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > index 904890598c11..2c7c92272fe3 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > @@ -899,7 +899,23 @@ static struct hid_driver corsairpsu_driver = { > .reset_resume = corsairpsu_resume, > #endif > }; > -module_hid_driver(corsairpsu_driver); > + > +static int __init corsair_init(void) > +{ > + return hid_register_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); > +} > + > +static void __exit corsair_exit(void) > +{ > + hid_unregister_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); > +} > + > +/* > + * With module_init() the driver would load before the HID bus when > + * built-in, so use late_initcall() instead. > + */ > +late_initcall(corsair_init); > +module_exit(corsair_exit); > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>"); > -- > 2.39.2 >
On 12/8/23 10:44, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:07:23 +0100 > Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrote: > > Just forgot. Did both, works just fine. Is it okay that way? This is my first > time. > > Tested-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net> > Reviewed-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net> > Yes, it is perfect, just a bit late. I sent the pull request pretty much in parallel (I didn't want to wait to make sure the patch makes it into v6.7-rc5). Thanks, Guenter
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c index 904890598c11..2c7c92272fe3 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c @@ -899,7 +899,23 @@ static struct hid_driver corsairpsu_driver = { .reset_resume = corsairpsu_resume, #endif }; -module_hid_driver(corsairpsu_driver); + +static int __init corsair_init(void) +{ + return hid_register_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); +} + +static void __exit corsair_exit(void) +{ + hid_unregister_driver(&corsairpsu_driver); +} + +/* + * With module_init() the driver would load before the HID bus when + * built-in, so use late_initcall() instead. + */ +late_initcall(corsair_init); +module_exit(corsair_exit); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>");
It seems that when the driver is built-in, the HID bus is initialized after the driver is loaded, which whould cause module_hid_driver() to fail. Fix this by registering the driver after the HID bus using late_initcall() in accordance with other hwmon HID drivers. Compile-tested only. Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> --- drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.39.2