Message ID | 20240130152903.3651341-1-naresh.solanki@9elements.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | hwmon: (pmbus_core) Allow to hook PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK | expand |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:59:03PM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote: > From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> > > Use _pmbus_write_word_data to allow intercepting writes to > PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK in the custom chip specific code. > > This is required for MP2971/MP2973 which doesn't follow the > PMBUS specification for PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK. Applied, but is there going to be a follow-up patch for those chips ? Thanks, Guenter
Hi Guenter, On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 22:01, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:59:03PM +0530, Naresh Solanki wrote: > > From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> > > > > Use _pmbus_write_word_data to allow intercepting writes to > > PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK in the custom chip specific code. > > > > This is required for MP2971/MP2973 which doesn't follow the > > PMBUS specification for PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK. > > Applied, but is there going to be a follow-up patch for those chips ? Yes. Regards, Naresh > > Thanks, > Guenter
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c index 1363d9f89181..cb4c65a7f288 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c @@ -3188,7 +3188,7 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_notify(struct pmbus_data *data, int page, int event) static int pmbus_write_smbalert_mask(struct i2c_client *client, u8 page, u8 reg, u8 val) { - return pmbus_write_word_data(client, page, PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK, reg | (val << 8)); + return _pmbus_write_word_data(client, page, PMBUS_SMBALERT_MASK, reg | (val << 8)); } static irqreturn_t pmbus_fault_handler(int irq, void *pdata)