Message ID | 20240216-dt-bindings-hwmon-common-v1-1-3c2c24ff1260@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | dt-bindings: hwmon: common schema | expand |
On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a > common schema for that. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From hwmon perspective: Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties > + > +maintainers: > + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > + > +properties: > + label: > + description: A descriptive name for this device. > + Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? Thanks, Guenter
On 16/02/2024 18:11, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a >> common schema for that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > From hwmon perspective: > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >> + >> +properties: >> + label: >> + description: A descriptive name for this device. >> + > > Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? It's not present on many devices, I think, so it is also not parsed by hwmon core. I plan to add above $ref to hwmon-common to each hwmon binding, so this would mean all of them will get shunt-resistor. I would not add it, but I also don't mind if I am overruled. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2/17/24 00:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/02/2024 18:11, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a >>> common schema for that. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> >> From hwmon perspective: >> >> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause >>> +%YAML 1.2 >>> +--- >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>> + >>> +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties >>> + >>> +maintainers: >>> + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >>> + >>> +properties: >>> + label: >>> + description: A descriptive name for this device. >>> + >> >> Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? > > It's not present on many devices, I think, so it is also not parsed by > hwmon core. I plan to add above $ref to hwmon-common to each hwmon > binding, so this would mean all of them will get shunt-resistor. I would > not add it, but I also don't mind if I am overruled. > No problem, I just don't know how such common rules are supposed to be understood. Thanks a lot for the clarification. Thanks, Guenter
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/02/2024 18:11, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a > >> common schema for that. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > > > From hwmon perspective: > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml > >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause > >> +%YAML 1.2 > >> +--- > >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >> + > >> +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties > >> + > >> +maintainers: > >> + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + label: > >> + description: A descriptive name for this device. > >> + > > > > Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? > > It's not present on many devices, I think, so it is also not parsed by > hwmon core. I plan to add above $ref to hwmon-common to each hwmon > binding, so this would mean all of them will get shunt-resistor. I would > not add it, but I also don't mind if I am overruled. I count 11 users. That's enough for me to add it here. I care less if a device uses a defined property it doesn't need. I'm more worried about having any undefined property allowed. Rob
On 22/02/2024 20:50, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16/02/2024 18:11, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 2/15/24 23:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a >>>> common schema for that. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >>> >>> From hwmon perspective: >>> >>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause >>>> +%YAML 1.2 >>>> +--- >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >>>> + >>>> +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties >>>> + >>>> +maintainers: >>>> + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >>>> + >>>> +properties: >>>> + label: >>>> + description: A descriptive name for this device. >>>> + >>> >>> Would it make sense to also add shunt-resistor-micro-ohms ? >> >> It's not present on many devices, I think, so it is also not parsed by >> hwmon core. I plan to add above $ref to hwmon-common to each hwmon >> binding, so this would mean all of them will get shunt-resistor. I would >> not add it, but I also don't mind if I am overruled. > > I count 11 users. That's enough for me to add it here. > > I care less if a device uses a defined property it doesn't need. I'm > more worried about having any undefined property allowed. Ack, I'll send a v2. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d83f4180f622 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Hardware Monitoring Devices Common Properties + +maintainers: + - Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> + +properties: + label: + description: A descriptive name for this device. + +additionalProperties: true
Linux hwmon core code parses "label" property for each device, so add a common schema for that. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/hwmon-common.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)