diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: amc6821: add PWM polarity

Message ID 20250224180801.128685-2-francesco@dolcini.it (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series hwmon: (amc6821) Add PWM polarity configuration with OF | expand

Commit Message

Francesco Dolcini Feb. 24, 2025, 6:08 p.m. UTC
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>

Add property to describe the PWM-Out pin polarity.

Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/amc6821
Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
---
v2: no changes
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250218165633.106867-2-francesco@dolcini.it/
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) Feb. 26, 2025, 1:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:08:00PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
> 
> Add property to describe the PWM-Out pin polarity.

Why doesn't the invert support in the pwm binding work for you? Yes, I 
read the discussion, but don't remember the conclusion and you need to 
justify it here.

> 
> Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/amc6821
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
> ---
> v2: no changes
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250218165633.106867-2-francesco@dolcini.it/
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
> index 5d33f1a23d03..11604aa41b3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
> @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ properties:
>    i2c-mux:
>      type: object
>  
> +  ti,pwm-inverted:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      Set to make the PWM-Out pin go high (with an external pull-up resistor)
> +      for 100% duty cycle (suitable for driving the fan using a NMOS device),
> +      when not set the PWM-Out pin goes low for 100% duty cycle (suitable for
> +      driving the fan using a PMOS device).
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> -- 
> 2.39.5
>
Francesco Dolcini Feb. 26, 2025, 1:58 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:49:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:08:00PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
> > 
> > Add property to describe the PWM-Out pin polarity.
> 
> Why doesn't the invert support in the pwm binding work for you? Yes, I 
> read the discussion, but don't remember the conclusion and you need to 
> justify it here.

This chip is not a PWM controller, it is a FAN controller.

The HW has a PWM pin output that is used to control the fan, but the
device is not modelled as a PWM controller (correctly, given that is not
such a device) and the OS does not control the PWM, the chip reads the
temperature and decide the PWM duty cycle accordingly in an autonomous
way.

It's just the same that was done in commit ed39ff506adb ("dt-bindings:
hwmon: Document adt7475 pwm-active-state property").

Francesco
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
index 5d33f1a23d03..11604aa41b3e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,amc6821.yaml
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@  properties:
   i2c-mux:
     type: object
 
+  ti,pwm-inverted:
+    type: boolean
+    description:
+      Set to make the PWM-Out pin go high (with an external pull-up resistor)
+      for 100% duty cycle (suitable for driving the fan using a NMOS device),
+      when not set the PWM-Out pin goes low for 100% duty cycle (suitable for
+      driving the fan using a PMOS device).
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg