Message ID | 20240609233826.330516-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup | expand |
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention > of 75 chars per line. > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > Patch 4/19: > - Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc() > into one function. > - Added better comment for the calculation. > - Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function. > > Patch 5/19: > - Fixed typo in commit message. > > Patch 6/19: > - Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be > broken. > > Patch 10/19: > - Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET() > > Patch 11/19: > - Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer. > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore. > > Patch 13/19: > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN > > Patch 14/19: > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > Patch 15/19: > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > Patch 16/19: **NEW** > - Use dev_err_probe() where applicable. > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are > are well split, in order to allow for better review. > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17 > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1]. > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive, > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please > let me know and I will fix it. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15): > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define > iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data > types > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff > iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read > iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data > iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization > iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union > iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent > iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure > iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe() > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration > iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw() > iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h | 41 +- > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc > -- > 2.25.1 > Hi Jonathan, It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews though anyways! :) Cheers, Vasilis
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200 Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied > > > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for > > > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag > > > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention > > of 75 chars per line. > > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > Patch 4/19: > > - Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc() > > into one function. > > - Added better comment for the calculation. > > - Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function. > > > > Patch 5/19: > > - Fixed typo in commit message. > > > > Patch 6/19: > > - Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be > > broken. > > > > Patch 10/19: > > - Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET() > > > > Patch 11/19: > > - Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer. > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore. > > > > Patch 13/19: > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN > > > > Patch 14/19: > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > Patch 15/19: > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > Patch 16/19: **NEW** > > - Use dev_err_probe() where applicable. > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are > > are well split, in order to allow for better review. > > > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17 > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1]. > > > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive, > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please > > let me know and I will fix it. > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master > > > > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15): > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define > > iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data > > types > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff > > iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read > > iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data > > iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization > > iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union > > iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent > > iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe() > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw() > > iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h | 41 +- > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++---------------- > > 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-) > > > > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews > though anyways! :) Hi, It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after an IIO pull request. They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago. It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests with the last one at risk because of timing. This stuff can only be in that final pull request. Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating needing any changes. Jonathan > > Cheers, > Vasilis >
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200 > Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: > > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied > > > > > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for > > > > > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag > > > > > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention > > > of 75 chars per line. > > > > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > > > Patch 4/19: > > > - Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc() > > > into one function. > > > - Added better comment for the calculation. > > > - Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function. > > > > > > Patch 5/19: > > > - Fixed typo in commit message. > > > > > > Patch 6/19: > > > - Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be > > > broken. > > > > > > Patch 10/19: > > > - Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET() > > > > > > Patch 11/19: > > > - Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer. > > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore. > > > > > > Patch 13/19: > > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN > > > > > > Patch 14/19: > > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > > > Patch 15/19: > > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > > > Patch 16/19: **NEW** > > > - Use dev_err_probe() where applicable. > > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new > > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might > > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are > > > are well split, in order to allow for better review. > > > > > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use > > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be > > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17 > > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a > > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1]. > > > > > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive, > > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things > > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with > > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much > > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please > > > let me know and I will fix it. > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b > > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf > > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master > > > > > > > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15): > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data > > > types > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe() > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw() > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions > > > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h | 41 +- > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++---------------- > > > 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this > > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally > > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in > > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews > > though anyways! :) > > Hi, > > It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first > few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep > the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and > back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after > an IIO pull request. > > They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago. > > It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests > with the last one at risk because of timing. This stuff can only be > in that final pull request. > > Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating > needing any changes. > > Jonathan > Hi Jonathan, Ok, since it is not lost perfect! No need to hurry or anything. Thanks! Cheers, Vasilis > > > > > > Cheers, > > Vasilis > > >
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:00:49 +0200 Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200 > > Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote: > > > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied > > > > > > > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for > > > > > > > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag > > > > > > > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention > > > > of 75 chars per line. > > > > > > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > Patch 4/19: > > > > - Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc() > > > > into one function. > > > > - Added better comment for the calculation. > > > > - Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function. > > > > > > > > Patch 5/19: > > > > - Fixed typo in commit message. > > > > > > > > Patch 6/19: > > > > - Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be > > > > broken. > > > > > > > > Patch 10/19: > > > > - Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET() > > > > > > > > Patch 11/19: > > > > - Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer. > > > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore. > > > > > > > > Patch 13/19: > > > > - Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN > > > > > > > > Patch 14/19: > > > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > > > > > Patch 15/19: > > > > - Splitted from Patch v1 14/19 > > > > > > > > Patch 16/19: **NEW** > > > > - Use dev_err_probe() where applicable. > > > > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new > > > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might > > > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are > > > > are well split, in order to allow for better review. > > > > > > > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use > > > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be > > > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17 > > > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a > > > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1]. > > > > > > > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive, > > > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things > > > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with > > > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much > > > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please > > > > let me know and I will fix it. > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b > > > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf > > > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master > > > > > > > > > > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15): > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data > > > > types > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe() > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw() > > > > iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions > > > > > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h | 41 +- > > > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++---------------- > > > > 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc > > > > -- > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this > > > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally > > > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in > > > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews > > > though anyways! :) > > > > Hi, > > > > It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first > > few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep > > the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and > > back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after > > an IIO pull request. > > > > They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago. > > > > It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests > > with the last one at risk because of timing. This stuff can only be > > in that final pull request. > > > > Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating > > needing any changes. > > > > Jonathan > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > Ok, since it is not lost perfect! No need to hurry or anything. Thanks! Applied to the testing branch of iio.git. Unfortunately the tree juggling meant this hit what is probably a few days too late to get another pull request out for 6.11. Hence I'm now treating this as 6.12 material. The tree will be rebased on 6.11-rc1 once available and pushed out then as togreg with linux-next picking that up. Thanks, Jonathan > > Cheers, > Vasilis > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Vasilis > > > > >