mbox series

[v3,00/15] iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup

Message ID 20240609233826.330516-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup | expand

Message

Vasileios Amoiridis June 9, 2024, 11:38 p.m. UTC
Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied

Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for

Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag

Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
	       of 75 chars per line.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/

Patch 4/19:
	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
	  into one function.
	- Added better comment for the calculation.
	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.

Patch 5/19:
	- Fixed typo in commit message.

Patch 6/19:
	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
	  broken.

Patch 10/19:
	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()

Patch 11/19:
	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.

Patch 13/19:
	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN

Patch 14/19:
	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19

Patch 15/19:
	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19

Patch 16/19: **NEW**
	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/

This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
are well split, in order to allow for better review.

The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].

In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
let me know and I will fix it.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
[2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
[3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master


Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
  iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
  iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
  iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
    types
  iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
  iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
  iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
  iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
  iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
  iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
  iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
  iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
  iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
  iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
  iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
  iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions

 drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
 drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)


base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc

Comments

Vasileios Amoiridis June 30, 2024, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied
> 
> Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for
> 
> Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag
> 
> Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
> 	       of 75 chars per line.
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> 
> Patch 4/19:
> 	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
> 	  into one function.
> 	- Added better comment for the calculation.
> 	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.
> 
> Patch 5/19:
> 	- Fixed typo in commit message.
> 
> Patch 6/19:
> 	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
> 	  broken.
> 
> Patch 10/19:
> 	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()
> 
> Patch 11/19:
> 	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
> 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.
> 
> Patch 13/19:
> 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN
> 
> Patch 14/19:
> 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> 
> Patch 15/19:
> 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> 
> Patch 16/19: **NEW**
> 	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> 
> This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
> BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
> be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
> are well split, in order to allow for better review.
> 
> The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
> of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
> marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
> is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
> very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].
> 
> In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
> and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
> that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
> links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
> and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
> let me know and I will fix it.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
> [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
> [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master
> 
> 
> Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
>     types
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
>   iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions
> 
>  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
>  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Hi Jonathan,

It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this
series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally
understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in
that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews
though anyways! :)

Cheers,
Vasilis
Jonathan Cameron July 1, 2024, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied
> > 
> > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for
> > 
> > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag
> > 
> > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
> > 	       of 75 chars per line.
> > 
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > 
> > Patch 4/19:
> > 	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
> > 	  into one function.
> > 	- Added better comment for the calculation.
> > 	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.
> > 
> > Patch 5/19:
> > 	- Fixed typo in commit message.
> > 
> > Patch 6/19:
> > 	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
> > 	  broken.
> > 
> > Patch 10/19:
> > 	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()
> > 
> > Patch 11/19:
> > 	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
> > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.
> > 
> > Patch 13/19:
> > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN
> > 
> > Patch 14/19:
> > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > 
> > Patch 15/19:
> > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > 
> > Patch 16/19: **NEW**
> > 	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.
> > 
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > 
> > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
> > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
> > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
> > are well split, in order to allow for better review.
> > 
> > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
> > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
> > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
> > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
> > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].
> > 
> > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
> > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
> > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
> > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
> > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
> > let me know and I will fix it.
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
> > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
> > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master
> > 
> > 
> > Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
> >     types
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
> >   iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions
> > 
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
> >  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> >   
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this
> series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally
> understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in
> that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews
> though anyways! :)

Hi,

It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first
few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep
the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and
back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after
an IIO pull request.

They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago.

It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests
with the last one at risk because of timing.  This stuff can only be
in that final pull request.

Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating
needing any changes.

Jonathan



> 
> Cheers,
> Vasilis
>
Vasileios Amoiridis July 1, 2024, 5 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200
> Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied
> > > 
> > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for
> > > 
> > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag
> > > 
> > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
> > > 	       of 75 chars per line.
> > > 
> > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > Patch 4/19:
> > > 	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
> > > 	  into one function.
> > > 	- Added better comment for the calculation.
> > > 	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.
> > > 
> > > Patch 5/19:
> > > 	- Fixed typo in commit message.
> > > 
> > > Patch 6/19:
> > > 	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
> > > 	  broken.
> > > 
> > > Patch 10/19:
> > > 	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()
> > > 
> > > Patch 11/19:
> > > 	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
> > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.
> > > 
> > > Patch 13/19:
> > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN
> > > 
> > > Patch 14/19:
> > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > 
> > > Patch 15/19:
> > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > 
> > > Patch 16/19: **NEW**
> > > 	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.
> > > 
> > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
> > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
> > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
> > > are well split, in order to allow for better review.
> > > 
> > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
> > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
> > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
> > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
> > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].
> > > 
> > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
> > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
> > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
> > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
> > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
> > > let me know and I will fix it.
> > > 
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
> > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
> > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
> > >     types
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
> > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions
> > > 
> > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
> > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
> > >  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > >   
> > 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this
> > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally
> > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in
> > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews
> > though anyways! :)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first
> few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep
> the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and
> back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after
> an IIO pull request.
> 
> They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago.
> 
> It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests
> with the last one at risk because of timing.  This stuff can only be
> in that final pull request.
> 
> Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating
> needing any changes.
> 
> Jonathan
> 

Hi Jonathan,

Ok, since it is not lost perfect! No need to hurry or anything. Thanks!

Cheers,
Vasilis

> 
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Vasilis
> > 
>
Jonathan Cameron July 7, 2024, 4:41 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:00:49 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200
> > Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:  
> > > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
> > > > 	       of 75 chars per line.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 4/19:
> > > > 	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
> > > > 	  into one function.
> > > > 	- Added better comment for the calculation.
> > > > 	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 5/19:
> > > > 	- Fixed typo in commit message.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 6/19:
> > > > 	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
> > > > 	  broken.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 10/19:
> > > > 	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 11/19:
> > > > 	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
> > > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 13/19:
> > > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 14/19:
> > > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 15/19:
> > > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 16/19: **NEW**
> > > > 	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.
> > > > 
> > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > > > 
> > > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
> > > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
> > > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
> > > > are well split, in order to allow for better review.
> > > > 
> > > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
> > > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
> > > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
> > > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
> > > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].
> > > > 
> > > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
> > > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
> > > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
> > > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
> > > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
> > > > let me know and I will fix it.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
> > > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
> > > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
> > > >     types
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
> > > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
> > > >  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >     
> > > 
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > 
> > > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this
> > > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally
> > > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in
> > > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews
> > > though anyways! :)  
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first
> > few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep
> > the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and
> > back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after
> > an IIO pull request.
> > 
> > They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago.
> > 
> > It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests
> > with the last one at risk because of timing.  This stuff can only be
> > in that final pull request.
> > 
> > Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating
> > needing any changes.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Ok, since it is not lost perfect! No need to hurry or anything. Thanks!

Applied to the testing branch of iio.git.
Unfortunately the tree juggling meant this hit what is probably a few days
too late to get another pull request out for 6.11.  Hence I'm now treating
this as 6.12 material.  The tree will be rebased  on 6.11-rc1 once available
and pushed out then as togreg with linux-next picking that up.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Cheers,
> Vasilis
> 
> > 
> >   
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Vasilis
> > >   
> >