Message ID | cover.1621944866.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | doc: add a couple fixups for IIO ABI files | expand |
On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:23:51 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote: > Patch 1 was already submitted as patch 10/10 on this series: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87wnrtnpko.fsf@meer.lwn.net/ > > However, it generated a new warning, due to a separate issue. > > So, resend it together with a warning fix patch. > > As these patches are independent from the other ones, I guess it > can either be applied via IIO or via docs tree, whatever works > best for the doc and IIO maintainers. > So, I should leave such decision to Jonathan & Jonathan ;-) Either works for me, but on basis I got here first. Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Jon, if you'd prefer I picked these up, then let me know. Thanks! > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2): > iio: ABI: sysfs-bus-iio: fix a typo > iio: ABI: sysfs-bus-iio: avoid a warning when doc is built > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> writes: > On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:23:51 +0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote: > >> Patch 1 was already submitted as patch 10/10 on this series: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87wnrtnpko.fsf@meer.lwn.net/ >> >> However, it generated a new warning, due to a separate issue. >> >> So, resend it together with a warning fix patch. >> >> As these patches are independent from the other ones, I guess it >> can either be applied via IIO or via docs tree, whatever works >> best for the doc and IIO maintainers. >> So, I should leave such decision to Jonathan & Jonathan ;-) > > Either works for me, but on basis I got here first. > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > Jon, if you'd prefer I picked these up, then let me know. I've applied them, thanks; I took the liberty of fixing the spelling of "specify" in the second one :) jon