Message ID | 1553518883-27972-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] iio: core: fix a possible circular locking dependency | expand |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:01:23 +0100 Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote: > This fixes a possible circular locking dependency detected warning seen > with: > - CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y > - consumer/provider IIO devices (ex: "voltage-divider" consumer of "adc") > > When using the IIO consumer interface, e.g. iio_channel_get(), the consumer > device will likely call iio_read_channel_raw() or similar that rely on > 'info_exist_lock' mutex. > > typically: > ... > mutex_lock(&chan->indio_dev->info_exist_lock); > if (chan->indio_dev->info == NULL) { > ret = -ENODEV; > goto err_unlock; > } > ret = do_some_ops() > err_unlock: > mutex_unlock(&chan->indio_dev->info_exist_lock); > return ret; > ... > > Same mutex is also hold in iio_device_unregister(). > > The following deadlock warning happens when: > - the consumer device has called an API like iio_read_channel_raw() > at least once. > - the consumer driver is unregistered, removed (unbind from sysfs) > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 4.19.24 #577 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > sh/372 is trying to acquire lock: > (kn->count#30){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3c/0x84 > > but task is already holding lock: > (&dev->info_exist_lock){+.+.}, at: iio_device_unregister+0x18/0x60 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #1 (&dev->info_exist_lock){+.+.}: > __mutex_lock+0x70/0xa3c > mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 > iio_read_channel_raw+0x1c/0x60 > iio_read_channel_info+0xa8/0xb0 > dev_attr_show+0x1c/0x48 > sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec > seq_read+0x154/0x528 > __vfs_read+0x2c/0x15c > vfs_read+0x8c/0x110 > ksys_read+0x4c/0xac > ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28 > 0xbedefb60 > > -> #0 (kn->count#30){++++}: > lock_acquire+0xd8/0x268 > __kernfs_remove+0x288/0x374 > kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3c/0x84 > remove_files+0x34/0x78 > sysfs_remove_group+0x40/0x9c > sysfs_remove_groups+0x24/0x34 > device_remove_attrs+0x38/0x64 > device_del+0x11c/0x360 > cdev_device_del+0x14/0x2c > iio_device_unregister+0x24/0x60 > release_nodes+0x1bc/0x200 > device_release_driver_internal+0x1a0/0x230 > unbind_store+0x80/0x130 > kernfs_fop_write+0x100/0x1e4 > __vfs_write+0x2c/0x160 > vfs_write+0xa4/0x17c > ksys_write+0x4c/0xac > ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28 > 0xbe906840 > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&dev->info_exist_lock); > lock(kn->count#30); > lock(&dev->info_exist_lock); > lock(kn->count#30); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > ... > > cdev_device_del() can be called without holding the lock. It should be safe > as info_exist_lock prevents kernelspace consumers to use the exported > routines during/after provider removal. cdev_device_del() is for userspace. > > Help to reproduce: > See example: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/voltage-divider.txt > sysv { > compatible = "voltage-divider"; > io-channels = <&adc 0>; > output-ohms = <22>; > full-ohms = <222>; > }; > > First, go to iio:deviceX for the "voltage-divider", do one read: > $ cd /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX > $ cat in_voltage0_raw > > Then, unbind the consumer driver. It triggers above deadlock warning. > $ cd /sys/bus/platform/drivers/iio-rescale/ > $ echo sysv > unbind > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> I've added a fixes tag to ac917a81117ce0286847666b55dd265f6cda8383 and marked for stable. Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git. Ouch this one has been there since 2012 Jonathan > --- > Changes in v2: > - call cdev_device_del() without holding the lock, as proposed by Jonathan > without reordering the unregister routine. > --- > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > index 4700fd5..9c4d921 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > @@ -1743,10 +1743,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__iio_device_register); > **/ > void iio_device_unregister(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > { > - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock); > - > cdev_device_del(&indio_dev->chrdev, &indio_dev->dev); > > + mutex_lock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock); > + > iio_device_unregister_debugfs(indio_dev); > > iio_disable_all_buffers(indio_dev);
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.19.24 #577 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sh/372 is trying to acquire lock: (kn->count#30){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3c/0x84 but task is already holding lock: (&dev->info_exist_lock){+.+.}, at: iio_device_unregister+0x18/0x60 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&dev->info_exist_lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x70/0xa3c mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 iio_read_channel_raw+0x1c/0x60 iio_read_channel_info+0xa8/0xb0 dev_attr_show+0x1c/0x48 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x84/0xec seq_read+0x154/0x528 __vfs_read+0x2c/0x15c vfs_read+0x8c/0x110 ksys_read+0x4c/0xac ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28 0xbedefb60 -> #0 (kn->count#30){++++}: lock_acquire+0xd8/0x268 __kernfs_remove+0x288/0x374 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3c/0x84 remove_files+0x34/0x78 sysfs_remove_group+0x40/0x9c sysfs_remove_groups+0x24/0x34 device_remove_attrs+0x38/0x64 device_del+0x11c/0x360 cdev_device_del+0x14/0x2c iio_device_unregister+0x24/0x60 release_nodes+0x1bc/0x200 device_release_driver_internal+0x1a0/0x230 unbind_store+0x80/0x130 kernfs_fop_write+0x100/0x1e4 __vfs_write+0x2c/0x160 vfs_write+0xa4/0x17c ksys_write+0x4c/0xac ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28 0xbe906840 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&dev->info_exist_lock); lock(kn->count#30); lock(&dev->info_exist_lock); lock(kn->count#30); *** DEADLOCK *** ... cdev_device_del() can be called without holding the lock. It should be safe as info_exist_lock prevents kernelspace consumers to use the exported routines during/after provider removal. cdev_device_del() is for userspace. Help to reproduce: See example: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/afe/voltage-divider.txt sysv { compatible = "voltage-divider"; io-channels = <&adc 0>; output-ohms = <22>; full-ohms = <222>; }; First, go to iio:deviceX for the "voltage-divider", do one read: $ cd /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX $ cat in_voltage0_raw Then, unbind the consumer driver. It triggers above deadlock warning. $ cd /sys/bus/platform/drivers/iio-rescale/ $ echo sysv > unbind Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> --- Changes in v2: - call cdev_device_del() without holding the lock, as proposed by Jonathan without reordering the unregister routine. --- drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c index 4700fd5..9c4d921 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c @@ -1743,10 +1743,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__iio_device_register); **/ void iio_device_unregister(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) { - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock); - cdev_device_del(&indio_dev->chrdev, &indio_dev->dev); + mutex_lock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock); + iio_device_unregister_debugfs(indio_dev); iio_disable_all_buffers(indio_dev);