Message ID | 20201203194612.3f35eda5@archlinux (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [PULL,V2] 2nd set of IIO new device support, cleanups and yaml conversions for the 5.11 cycle | expand |
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:46:12PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > The following changes since commit 749c1e1481e1d242ded9dd1bf210ddb7c0d22a4f: > > Merge tag 'iio-for-5.11a' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio into staging-next (2020-11-24 08:30:08 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-for-5.11b-take2 Much better, thanks. Pulled and pushed out, thanks. greg k-h
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:47 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> dt-bindings:iio:st,st-sensors: txt to yaml conversion.
Somehow I managed to totally miss that you made this conversion
and did my own conversion in parallel and sent out yesterday.
Oh well such things happen.
Shall I make an incremental patch or something? I think I could
just copy my binding on top, the diff may be a bit big.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 13:54:00 +0100 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:47 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > > > dt-bindings:iio:st,st-sensors: txt to yaml conversion. > > Somehow I managed to totally miss that you made this conversion > and did my own conversion in parallel and sent out yesterday. > > Oh well such things happen. > > Shall I make an incremental patch or something? I think I could > just copy my binding on top, the diff may be a bit big. Hmm. You did a much more thorough job than me so definitely good to get the tighter constraints. I guess it will be a question of hand tweaking your patch to keep the few blocks don't need updates the same. Bad luck on timing on that one! Jonathan > > Yours, > Linus Walleij