Message ID | 20220609083213.1795019-7-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: add support for temperature sensor | expand |
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:32:03 +0300 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> wrote: > Add 64 and 256 oversampling ratio support. It is necessary for temperature > sensor. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > index 7321a4b519af..b52f1020feaf 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct at91_adc_reg_layout { > #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES 0 > #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES 1 > #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES 2 > +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES 3 > +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES 4 > > /* Extended Mode Register - Averaging on single trigger event */ > #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_ASTE(V) ((V) << 20) > @@ -308,6 +310,8 @@ static const struct at91_adc_reg_layout sama7g5_layout = { > #define AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES 1 > #define AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES 4 > #define AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES 16 > +#define AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES 64 > +#define AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES 256 These defines seems a bit silly. Better to use the values inline than to have these. > > #define AT91_SAMA5D2_CHAN_SINGLE(index, num, addr) \ > { \ > @@ -640,7 +644,9 @@ static const struct at91_adc_platform sama7g5_platform = { > .osr_mask = GENMASK(18, 16), > .osr_vals = BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES) | > BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES) | > - BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES), > + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES) | > + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES) | > + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES), > .chan_realbits = 16, > }; > > @@ -774,6 +780,18 @@ static int at91_adc_config_emr(struct at91_adc_state *st, > emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES, > osr_mask); > break; > + case AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES: > + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES))) > + return -EINVAL; > + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES, > + osr_mask); > + break; > + case AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES: > + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES))) > + return -EINVAL; > + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES, > + osr_mask); > + break; > } > > at91_adc_writel(st, EMR, emr); > @@ -791,6 +809,10 @@ static int at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(struct at91_adc_state *st, int *val) > nbits = 13; > else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) > nbits = 14; > + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) > + nbits = 15; > + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES) > + nbits = 16; > > /* > * We have nbits of real data and channel is registered as > @@ -1679,7 +1701,8 @@ static int at91_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > switch (mask) { > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO: > if ((val != AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) && > - (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)) > + (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) && > + (val != AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)) Dropping this partial validity check and moving into a default in the switch statement in config_emr() would be nice cleanup (I also replied to earlier patch based on what is visible here). > return -EINVAL; > /* if no change, optimize out */ > mutex_lock(&st->lock); > @@ -1897,7 +1920,9 @@ static IIO_CONST_ATTR(hwfifo_watermark_max, AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE_STR); > static IIO_CONST_ATTR(oversampling_ratio_available, > __stringify(AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) " " > __stringify(AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) " " > - __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)); > + __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) " " > + __stringify(AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) " " > + __stringify(AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)); At somepoint it would be good to move this over to the read_avail() callback rather than hand rolling it. We are slowly working through doing this for all the IIO drivers but it will take a long time yet! > > static struct attribute *at91_adc_attributes[] = { > &iio_const_attr_oversampling_ratio_available.dev_attr.attr,
On 11.06.2022 20:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:32:03 +0300 > Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> wrote: > >> Add 64 and 256 oversampling ratio support. It is necessary for temperature >> sensor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> >> --- >> drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c >> index 7321a4b519af..b52f1020feaf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c >> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct at91_adc_reg_layout { >> #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES 0 >> #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES 1 >> #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES 2 >> +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES 3 >> +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES 4 >> >> /* Extended Mode Register - Averaging on single trigger event */ >> #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_ASTE(V) ((V) << 20) >> @@ -308,6 +310,8 @@ static const struct at91_adc_reg_layout sama7g5_layout = { >> #define AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES 1 >> #define AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES 4 >> #define AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES 16 >> +#define AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES 64 >> +#define AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES 256 > > These defines seems a bit silly. Better to use the values inline than > to have these. > >> >> #define AT91_SAMA5D2_CHAN_SINGLE(index, num, addr) \ >> { \ >> @@ -640,7 +644,9 @@ static const struct at91_adc_platform sama7g5_platform = { >> .osr_mask = GENMASK(18, 16), >> .osr_vals = BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES) | >> BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES) | >> - BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES), >> + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES) | >> + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES) | >> + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES), >> .chan_realbits = 16, >> }; >> >> @@ -774,6 +780,18 @@ static int at91_adc_config_emr(struct at91_adc_state *st, >> emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES, >> osr_mask); >> break; >> + case AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES: >> + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES))) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES, >> + osr_mask); >> + break; >> + case AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES: >> + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES))) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES, >> + osr_mask); >> + break; >> } >> >> at91_adc_writel(st, EMR, emr); >> @@ -791,6 +809,10 @@ static int at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(struct at91_adc_state *st, int *val) >> nbits = 13; >> else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) >> nbits = 14; >> + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) >> + nbits = 15; >> + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES) >> + nbits = 16; >> >> /* >> * We have nbits of real data and channel is registered as >> @@ -1679,7 +1701,8 @@ static int at91_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, >> switch (mask) { >> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO: >> if ((val != AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) && >> - (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)) >> + (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) && >> + (val != AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)) > Dropping this partial validity check and moving into a default in the switch statement > in config_emr() would be nice cleanup (I also replied to earlier patch based on what > is visible here). Sure, I'll check it. > >> return -EINVAL; >> /* if no change, optimize out */ >> mutex_lock(&st->lock); >> @@ -1897,7 +1920,9 @@ static IIO_CONST_ATTR(hwfifo_watermark_max, AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE_STR); >> static IIO_CONST_ATTR(oversampling_ratio_available, >> __stringify(AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) " " >> __stringify(AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) " " >> - __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)); >> + __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) " " >> + __stringify(AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) " " >> + __stringify(AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)); > > At somepoint it would be good to move this over to the read_avail() callback rather than > hand rolling it. We are slowly working through doing this for all the IIO drivers > but it will take a long time yet! I'll check this, too. > >> >> static struct attribute *at91_adc_attributes[] = { >> &iio_const_attr_oversampling_ratio_available.dev_attr.attr, >
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c index 7321a4b519af..b52f1020feaf 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct at91_adc_reg_layout { #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES 0 #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES 1 #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES 2 +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES 3 +#define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES 4 /* Extended Mode Register - Averaging on single trigger event */ #define AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_ASTE(V) ((V) << 20) @@ -308,6 +310,8 @@ static const struct at91_adc_reg_layout sama7g5_layout = { #define AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES 1 #define AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES 4 #define AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES 16 +#define AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES 64 +#define AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES 256 #define AT91_SAMA5D2_CHAN_SINGLE(index, num, addr) \ { \ @@ -640,7 +644,9 @@ static const struct at91_adc_platform sama7g5_platform = { .osr_mask = GENMASK(18, 16), .osr_vals = BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_1SAMPLES) | BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_4SAMPLES) | - BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES), + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES) | + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES) | + BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES), .chan_realbits = 16, }; @@ -774,6 +780,18 @@ static int at91_adc_config_emr(struct at91_adc_state *st, emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_16SAMPLES, osr_mask); break; + case AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES: + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES))) + return -EINVAL; + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_64SAMPLES, + osr_mask); + break; + case AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES: + if (!(osr_vals & BIT(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES))) + return -EINVAL; + emr |= AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR(AT91_SAMA5D2_EMR_OSR_256SAMPLES, + osr_mask); + break; } at91_adc_writel(st, EMR, emr); @@ -791,6 +809,10 @@ static int at91_adc_adjust_val_osr(struct at91_adc_state *st, int *val) nbits = 13; else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) nbits = 14; + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) + nbits = 15; + else if (st->oversampling_ratio == AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES) + nbits = 16; /* * We have nbits of real data and channel is registered as @@ -1679,7 +1701,8 @@ static int at91_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, switch (mask) { case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO: if ((val != AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) && - (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)) + (val != AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) && (val != AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) && + (val != AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)) return -EINVAL; /* if no change, optimize out */ mutex_lock(&st->lock); @@ -1897,7 +1920,9 @@ static IIO_CONST_ATTR(hwfifo_watermark_max, AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE_STR); static IIO_CONST_ATTR(oversampling_ratio_available, __stringify(AT91_OSR_1SAMPLES) " " __stringify(AT91_OSR_4SAMPLES) " " - __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES)); + __stringify(AT91_OSR_16SAMPLES) " " + __stringify(AT91_OSR_64SAMPLES) " " + __stringify(AT91_OSR_256SAMPLES)); static struct attribute *at91_adc_attributes[] = { &iio_const_attr_oversampling_ratio_available.dev_attr.attr,
Add 64 and 256 oversampling ratio support. It is necessary for temperature sensor. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> --- drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)