Message ID | 20231116192711.366441-1-jic23@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | iio: light: pa1203001: Drop ACPI_PTR() protection. | expand |
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:27:11 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > The extra cost of always including the acpi_device_id table is trivial > vs the complexity of adding guards or __maybe_unused markings so > just stop using the ACPI_PTR() macro. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311160851.FDA4CDVE-lkp@intel.com/ > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Meh. Guess not that exciting to review :) Applied anyway, so hopefully I haven't shot myself in the foot. Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c > index ed241598aefb..636432c45651 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c > @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver pa12203001_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = PA12203001_DRIVER_NAME, > .pm = &pa12203001_pm_ops, > - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pa12203001_acpi_match), > + .acpi_match_table = pa12203001_acpi_match, > }, > .probe = pa12203001_probe, > .remove = pa12203001_remove,
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c index ed241598aefb..636432c45651 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/pa12203001.c @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver pa12203001_driver = { .driver = { .name = PA12203001_DRIVER_NAME, .pm = &pa12203001_pm_ops, - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pa12203001_acpi_match), + .acpi_match_table = pa12203001_acpi_match, }, .probe = pa12203001_probe, .remove = pa12203001_remove,