Message ID | 20241101081203.3360421-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | iio: initialise ddata for iio_get_acpi_device_name_and_data() | expand |
> When iio_get_acpi_device_name_and_data() fails, the ddata may be left > uninitialised. Initialise it to NULL. Would a summary phrase like “Assign NULL to ddata in isl29018_probe()” be helpful? How do you think about a null pointer check also with the local variable “name” instead? Regards, Markus
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c b/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c index cbe34026bda6..201eae1c4589 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int isl29018_probe(struct i2c_client *client) const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client); struct isl29018_chip *chip; struct iio_dev *indio_dev; - const void *ddata; + const void *ddata = NULL; const char *name; int dev_id; int err;
When iio_get_acpi_device_name_and_data() fails, the ddata may be left uninitialised. Initialise it to NULL. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/54fac4a7-b601-40ce-8c00-d94807f5e214@stanley.mountain Fixes: 14686836fb69 ("iio: light: isl29018: Replace a variant of iio_get_acpi_device_name_and_data()") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)