@@ -201,6 +201,11 @@ static int cyttsp4_si_get_cydata(struct cyttsp4 *cd)
void *p;
int rc;
+ if (si->si_ofs.test_ofs <= si->si_ofs.cydata_ofs) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "%s: invalid offset test_ofs:%zd, cydata_ofs:%zd \n", __func__, si->si_ofs.test_ofs, si->si_ofs.cydata_ofs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
si->si_ofs.cydata_size = si->si_ofs.test_ofs - si->si_ofs.cydata_ofs;
dev_dbg(cd->dev, "%s: cydata size: %zd\n", __func__,
si->si_ofs.cydata_size);
@@ -270,6 +275,11 @@ static int cyttsp4_si_get_test_data(struct cyttsp4 *cd)
void *p;
int rc;
+ if (si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs <= si->si_ofs.test_ofs) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "%s: invalid offset pcfg_ofs:%zd, test_ofs:%zd \n", __func__, si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs, si->si_ofs.test_ofs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
si->si_ofs.test_size = si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs - si->si_ofs.test_ofs;
p = krealloc(si->si_ptrs.test, si->si_ofs.test_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -321,6 +331,11 @@ static int cyttsp4_si_get_pcfg_data(struct cyttsp4 *cd)
void *p;
int rc;
+ if (si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs <= si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "%s: invalid offset opcfg_ofs:%zd, pcfg_ofs:%zd \n", __func__, si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs, si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
si->si_ofs.pcfg_size = si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs - si->si_ofs.pcfg_ofs;
p = krealloc(si->si_ptrs.pcfg, si->si_ofs.pcfg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -367,6 +382,11 @@ static int cyttsp4_si_get_opcfg_data(struct cyttsp4 *cd)
void *p;
int rc;
+ if (si->si_ofs.ddata_ofs <= si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "%s: invalid offset ddata_ofs:%zd, opcfg_ofs:%zd \n", __func__, si->si_ofs.ddata_ofs, si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
si->si_ofs.opcfg_size = si->si_ofs.ddata_ofs - si->si_ofs.opcfg_ofs;
p = krealloc(si->si_ptrs.opcfg, si->si_ofs.opcfg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
There are several places to perform subtraction to calculate buffer size such as: si->si_ofs.cydata_size = si->si_ofs.test_ofs - si->si_ofs.cydata_ofs; ... p = krealloc(si->si_ptrs.cydata, si->si_ofs.cydata_size, GFP_KERNEL); Actually, data types of above variables during subtraction are size_t, so it is unsigned. That means if second operand(si->si_ofs.cydata_ofs) is greater than the first operand(si->si_ofs.test_ofs), then resulting si->si_ofs.cydata_size could result in an unsigned integer wrap which is not desiarable. The properway to correct this problem is to perform a test of both operands to avoid having unsigned wrap. Signed-off-by: Vince Kim <vince.k.kim@gmail.com> --- Cahnges in v2: - added missing opening curly brace at if statement drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)