| Message ID | 20140417202209.GA30268@www.outflux.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Jiri Kosina |
| Headers | show |
Pinging on this patch... I don't see it in -next yet. I've had more reports of trouble with logitech devices, and this seems to solve the problem. -Kees On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > Some drivers use the first HID report in the list instead of using an > index. In these cases, validation uses ID 0, which was supposed to mean > "first known report". This fixes the problem, which was causing at least > the lgff family of devices to stop working since hid_validate_values > was being called with ID 0, but the devices used single numbered IDs > for their reports: > > 0x05, 0x01, /* Usage Page (Desktop), */ > 0x09, 0x05, /* Usage (Gamepad), */ > 0xA1, 0x01, /* Collection (Application), */ > 0xA1, 0x02, /* Collection (Logical), */ > 0x85, 0x01, /* Report ID (1), */ > ... > > Reported-by: Simon Wood <simon@mungewell.org> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > index 9e8064205bc7..07ce28175168 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > @@ -839,7 +839,17 @@ struct hid_report *hid_validate_values(struct hid_device *hid, > * ->numbered being checked, which may not always be the case when > * drivers go to access report values. > */ > - report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; > + if (id == 0) { > + /* > + * Validating on id 0 means we should examine the first > + * report in the list. > + */ > + report = list_entry( > + hid->report_enum[type].report_list.next, > + struct hid_report, list); > + } else { > + report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; > + } > if (!report) { > hid_err(hid, "missing %s %u\n", hid_report_names[type], id); > return NULL; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > > -- > Kees Cook > Chrome OS Security
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > Pinging on this patch... I don't see it in -next yet. I've had more > reports of trouble with logitech devices, and this seems to solve the > problem. > > -Kees > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: >> Some drivers use the first HID report in the list instead of using an >> index. In these cases, validation uses ID 0, which was supposed to mean >> "first known report". This fixes the problem, which was causing at least >> the lgff family of devices to stop working since hid_validate_values >> was being called with ID 0, but the devices used single numbered IDs >> for their reports: >> >> 0x05, 0x01, /* Usage Page (Desktop), */ >> 0x09, 0x05, /* Usage (Gamepad), */ >> 0xA1, 0x01, /* Collection (Application), */ >> 0xA1, 0x02, /* Collection (Logical), */ >> 0x85, 0x01, /* Report ID (1), */ >> ... >> >> Reported-by: Simon Wood <simon@mungewell.org> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> --- Oops, sorry, I should have commented on it earlier: Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Cheers, Benjamin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Kees Cook wrote: > Pinging on this patch... I don't see it in -next yet. I've had more > reports of trouble with logitech devices, and this seems to solve the > problem. Apologizes for this taking so long time. I have now queued your patch. Thanks,
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 9e8064205bc7..07ce28175168 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -839,7 +839,17 @@ struct hid_report *hid_validate_values(struct hid_device *hid, * ->numbered being checked, which may not always be the case when * drivers go to access report values. */ - report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; + if (id == 0) { + /* + * Validating on id 0 means we should examine the first + * report in the list. + */ + report = list_entry( + hid->report_enum[type].report_list.next, + struct hid_report, list); + } else { + report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; + } if (!report) { hid_err(hid, "missing %s %u\n", hid_report_names[type], id); return NULL;
Some drivers use the first HID report in the list instead of using an index. In these cases, validation uses ID 0, which was supposed to mean "first known report". This fixes the problem, which was causing at least the lgff family of devices to stop working since hid_validate_values was being called with ID 0, but the devices used single numbered IDs for their reports: 0x05, 0x01, /* Usage Page (Desktop), */ 0x09, 0x05, /* Usage (Gamepad), */ 0xA1, 0x01, /* Collection (Application), */ 0xA1, 0x02, /* Collection (Logical), */ 0x85, 0x01, /* Report ID (1), */ ... Reported-by: Simon Wood <simon@mungewell.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)