diff mbox

HID: multitouch: Fetch feature reports on demand for Win8 devices

Message ID 20150930084557.GE1551@lahna.fi.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Delegated to: Jiri Kosina
Headers show

Commit Message

Mika Westerberg Sept. 30, 2015, 8:45 a.m. UTC
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:04:31AM -0400, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > +static void mt_get_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report)
> > +{
> > +	int ret, size = hid_report_len(report);
> > +	u8 *buf;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Only fetch the feature report if initial reports are not already
> > +	 * been retrieved. Currently this is only done for Windows 8 touch
> > +	 * devices.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!(hdev->quirks & HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORTS))
> > +		return;
> 
> Some Win 7 panels have this quirk set too because they do not support
> either querying random feature or input reports.
> 
> I think this test is safe given that this is, I think, what the Windows
> driver does (I remember that it queries for the features it needs).
> However I am not 100% sure if this will not break one low quality
> touchscreen.
> 
> I would be in favor of applying the patch in its current shape, but if
> Jiri thinks we need a little bit more caution here, we would need to add
> a test regarding the Win8 capability here.

What about adding following on top of this patch? It checks the device
in question belongs to "win8 class".

I can send a new version of the patch if this seems reasonable.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Jiri Kosina Oct. 6, 2015, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote:

> > I would be in favor of applying the patch in its current shape, but if
> > Jiri thinks we need a little bit more caution here, we would need to add
> > a test regarding the Win8 capability here.
> 
> What about adding following on top of this patch? It checks the device
> in question belongs to "win8 class".
> 
> I can send a new version of the patch if this seems reasonable.

If this actually maintains the backwards compatibility for that particular 
device Benjamin mentioned (no idea what mtclass does it have?), I'd be in 
favor of doing that.

Thanks,
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index d9ca2b96ab68..72c55a3f650f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@  static struct attribute_group mt_attribute_group = {
 
 static void mt_get_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report)
 {
+	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
 	int ret, size = hid_report_len(report);
 	u8 *buf;
 
@@ -319,7 +320,8 @@  static void mt_get_feature(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report)
 	 * been retrieved. Currently this is only done for Windows 8 touch
 	 * devices.
 	 */
-	if (!(hdev->quirks & HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORTS))
+	if (!(hdev->quirks & HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORTS) ||
+	    td->mtclass.name != MT_CLS_WIN_8)
 		return;
 
 	buf = hid_alloc_report_buf(report, GFP_KERNEL);