From patchwork Sat Apr 20 11:21:44 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 10910229 X-Patchwork-Delegate: jikos@jikos.cz Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E901515 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A2528D25 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0E3BD28D94; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A3C28D25 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728001AbfDTLW3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2019 07:22:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60488 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726082AbfDTLW2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Apr 2019 07:22:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEA6804F2; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shalem.localdomain.com (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9858019C5A; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Hans de Goede , Nestor Lopez Casado , linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 04/37] HID: logitech-dj: fix variable naming in logi_dj_hidpp_event Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:21:44 +0200 Message-Id: <20190420112217.27590-5-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190420112217.27590-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20190420112217.27590-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Benjamin Tissoires we are not dealing with a dj_report but a hidpp_event. We don't need all of the struct description in this function, but having the variable named `dj_report` feels weird. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c index f2e994d11b70..6408ef13e909 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c @@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ struct dj_report { u8 report_params[DJREPORT_SHORT_LENGTH - 3]; }; +struct hidpp_event { + u8 report_id; + u8 device_index; + u8 sub_id; + u8 params[HIDPP_REPORT_LONG_LENGTH - 3U]; +} __packed; + struct dj_receiver_dev { struct hid_device *hdev; struct dj_device *paired_dj_devices[DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES + @@ -907,9 +914,9 @@ static int logi_dj_hidpp_event(struct hid_device *hdev, int size) { struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev = hid_get_drvdata(hdev); - struct dj_report *dj_report = (struct dj_report *) data; + struct hidpp_event *hidpp_report = (struct hidpp_event *) data; unsigned long flags; - u8 device_index = dj_report->device_index; + u8 device_index = hidpp_report->device_index; if (device_index == HIDPP_RECEIVER_INDEX) { /* special case were the device wants to know its unifying @@ -938,7 +945,7 @@ static int logi_dj_hidpp_event(struct hid_device *hdev, * so ignore those reports too. */ dev_err(&hdev->dev, "%s: invalid device index:%d\n", - __func__, dj_report->device_index); + __func__, hidpp_report->device_index); return false; }