| Message ID | 20230203220850.13924-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | 7bcfdab3f0c6672ca52be3cb65a0550d8b99554b |
| Delegated to: | Jiri Kosina |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] HID: amd_sfh: if no sensors are enabled, clean up | expand |
On 2/4/2023 3:38 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote: > It was reported that commit b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the > interrupt for all command") had caused increased resume time on HP Envy > x360. > > Before this commit 3 sensors were reported, but they were not actually > functional. After this commit the sensors are no longer reported, but > also the resume time increased. > > To avoid this problem explicitly look for the number of disabled sensors. > If all the sensors are disabled, clean everything up. > > Fixes: b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the interrupt for all command") > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2115 > Reported-by: Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> > --- > v1->v2: > * Use a boolean parameter instead > --- > drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c > index 1fb0f7105fb21..c751d12f5df89 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c > @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) > cl_data->num_hid_devices = amd_mp2_get_sensor_num(privdata, &cl_data->sensor_idx[0]); > if (cl_data->num_hid_devices == 0) > return -ENODEV; > + cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled = false; > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work, amd_sfh_work); > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work_buffer, amd_sfh_work_buffer); > @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) > status = amd_sfh_wait_for_response > (privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i], SENSOR_ENABLED); > if (status == SENSOR_ENABLED) { > + cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled = true; > cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = SENSOR_ENABLED; > rc = amdtp_hid_probe(cl_data->cur_hid_dev, cl_data); > if (rc) { > @@ -301,19 +303,26 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) > cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); > goto cleanup; > } > + } else { > + cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = SENSOR_DISABLED; > + dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n", > + cl_data->sensor_idx[i], > + get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]), > + cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); > } > dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n", > cl_data->sensor_idx[i], get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]), > cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); > } > - if (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0) { > + if (!cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled || > + (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0)) { > amd_sfh_hid_client_deinit(privdata); > for (i = 0; i < cl_data->num_hid_devices; i++) { > devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->feature_report[i]); > devm_kfree(dev, in_data->input_report[i]); > devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->report_descr[i]); > } > - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to discover, sensors not enabled\n"); > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to discover, sensors not enabled is %d\n", cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled); > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > schedule_delayed_work(&cl_data->work_buffer, msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_IDLE_LOOP)); > diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h > index 3754fb423e3ae..528036892c9d2 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h > +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct amd_input_data { > struct amdtp_cl_data { > u8 init_done; > u32 cur_hid_dev; > + bool is_any_sensor_enabled; > u32 hid_dev_count; > u32 num_hid_devices; > struct device_info *hid_devices; Changes looks good to me Acked-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com> Thanks, -- Basavaraj
On Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:08:49 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: > It was reported that commit b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the > interrupt for all command") had caused increased resume time on HP Envy > x360. > > Before this commit 3 sensors were reported, but they were not actually > functional. After this commit the sensors are no longer reported, but > also the resume time increased. > > [...] Applied to hid/hid.git (for-6.2/upstream-fixes), thanks! [1/1] HID: amd_sfh: if no sensors are enabled, clean up https://git.kernel.org/hid/hid/c/7bcfdab3f0c6 Cheers,
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c index 1fb0f7105fb21..c751d12f5df89 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) cl_data->num_hid_devices = amd_mp2_get_sensor_num(privdata, &cl_data->sensor_idx[0]); if (cl_data->num_hid_devices == 0) return -ENODEV; + cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled = false; INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work, amd_sfh_work); INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work_buffer, amd_sfh_work_buffer); @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) status = amd_sfh_wait_for_response (privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i], SENSOR_ENABLED); if (status == SENSOR_ENABLED) { + cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled = true; cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = SENSOR_ENABLED; rc = amdtp_hid_probe(cl_data->cur_hid_dev, cl_data); if (rc) { @@ -301,19 +303,26 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata) cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); goto cleanup; } + } else { + cl_data->sensor_sts[i] = SENSOR_DISABLED; + dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n", + cl_data->sensor_idx[i], + get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]), + cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); } dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n", cl_data->sensor_idx[i], get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]), cl_data->sensor_sts[i]); } - if (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0) { + if (!cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled || + (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0)) { amd_sfh_hid_client_deinit(privdata); for (i = 0; i < cl_data->num_hid_devices; i++) { devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->feature_report[i]); devm_kfree(dev, in_data->input_report[i]); devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->report_descr[i]); } - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to discover, sensors not enabled\n"); + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to discover, sensors not enabled is %d\n", cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } schedule_delayed_work(&cl_data->work_buffer, msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_IDLE_LOOP)); diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h index 3754fb423e3ae..528036892c9d2 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct amd_input_data { struct amdtp_cl_data { u8 init_done; u32 cur_hid_dev; + bool is_any_sensor_enabled; u32 hid_dev_count; u32 num_hid_devices; struct device_info *hid_devices;
It was reported that commit b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the interrupt for all command") had caused increased resume time on HP Envy x360. Before this commit 3 sensors were reported, but they were not actually functional. After this commit the sensors are no longer reported, but also the resume time increased. To avoid this problem explicitly look for the number of disabled sensors. If all the sensors are disabled, clean everything up. Fixes: b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the interrupt for all command") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2115 Reported-by: Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> --- v1->v2: * Use a boolean parameter instead --- drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c | 13 +++++++++++-- drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)