new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Usage Model of the ACPI Control Method Lid Device
+
+Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+Author: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
+
+
+Abstract:
+
+Platforms containing lids convey lid state (open/close) to OSPMs using a
+control method lid device. To implement this, the AML tables issue
+Notify(lid_device, 0x80) to notify the OSPMs whenever the lid state has
+changed. The _LID control method for the lid device must be implemented to
+report the "current" state of the lid as either "opened" or "closed".
+
+This document describes the restrictions and the expections of the Linux
+ACPI lid device driver.
+
+
+1. Restrictions of the returning value of the _LID control method
+
+The _LID control method is described to return the "current" lid state.
+However the word of "current" has ambiguity, many AML tables return the lid
+state upon the last lid notification instead of returning the lid state
+upon the last _LID evaluation. There won't be difference when the _LID
+control method is evaluated during the runtime, the problem is its initial
+returning value. When the AML tables implement this control method with
+cached value, the initial returning value is likely not reliable. There are
+simply so many examples always retuning "closed" as initial lid state.
+
+2. Restrictions of the lid state change notifications
+
+There are many AML tables never notifying when the lid device state is
+changed to "opened". Thus the "opened" notification is not guaranteed.
+
+But it is guaranteed that the AML tables always notify "closed" when the
+lid state is changed to "closed". The "closed" notification is normally
+used to trigger some system power saving operations on Windows. Since it is
+fully tested, the "closed" notification is reliable for all AML tables.
+
+3. Expections for the userspace users of the ACPI lid device driver
+
+The ACPI button driver exports the lid state to the userspace via the
+following file:
+ /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state
+This file actually calls the _LID control method described above. And given
+the previous explanation, it is not reliable enough on some platforms. So
+it is advised for the userspace program to not to solely rely on this file
+to determine the actual lid state.
+
+The ACPI button driver emits 2 kinds of events to the user space:
+ SW_LID
+ When the lid state/event is reliable, the userspace can behave
+ according to this input switch event.
+ This is a mode prepared for backward compatiblity.
+ KEY_EVENT_OPEN/KEY_EVENT_CLOSE
+ When the lid state/event is not reliable, the userspace should behave
+ according to these 2 input key events.
+ New userspace programs may only be prepared for the input key events.
+
+If the userspace hasn't been prepared to handle the new input lid key
+events, Linux users can use the following kernel parameters to handle the
+possible issues triggered because of the unreliable lid state/event:
+A. button.lid_init_state=method:
+ When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver reports the
+ initial lid state using the returning value of the _LID control method.
+ This option can be used to fix some platforms where the _LID control
+ method's returning value is reliable but the initial lid state
+ notification is missing.
+ This option is the default behavior during the period the userspace
+ isn't ready to handle the new usage model.
+B. button.lid_init_state=open:
+ When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver always reports the
+ initial lid state as "opened".
+ This may fix some platforms where the returning value of the _LID
+ control method is not reliable and the initial lid state notification is
+ missing.
+
+If the userspace has been prepared to handle the new input lid key events,
+Linux users should always use the following kernel parameter:
+C. button.lid_init_state=ignore:
+ When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver never reports the
+ initial lid state. However, the platform may automatically report a
+ correct initial lid state and there is no "open" event missing. When
+ this is the case (everything is correctly implemented by the platform
+ firmware), the old input switch event based userspace can still work.
+ Otherwise, the userspace programs may only work based on the input key
+ events.
+ This option will be the default behavior after the userspace is ready to
+ handle the new usage model.