Message ID | f1728883a5bf4481eb1d45e7b7a71005e29e259a.1632467859.git.geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Input: gpio-keys - print button label in IRQ button error messages | expand |
Hi Geert, On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:18:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > When an error message related to IRQ buttons is printed, no clue is > given about the actual button that caused the failure. Fix this by > including the button label, to make it more obvious which button has an > incomplete or incorrect hardware description. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > --- > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > index 0f2250c6aa4978d5..fc706918d7b103cb 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > @@ -617,14 +617,16 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev, > } > } else { > if (!button->irq) { > - dev_err(dev, "Found button without gpio or irq\n"); > + dev_err(dev, "Found button %s without gpio or irq\n", > + desc); I do not believe description is mandatory, so we may end up printing "gpio_keys" here. I wonder if it would not be more reliable to print the index of the problematic key? Thanks.
Hi Dmitry, On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:34 AM Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:18:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > When an error message related to IRQ buttons is printed, no clue is > > given about the actual button that caused the failure. Fix this by > > including the button label, to make it more obvious which button has an > > incomplete or incorrect hardware description. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > > --- > > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > > index 0f2250c6aa4978d5..fc706918d7b103cb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c > > @@ -617,14 +617,16 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev, > > } > > } else { > > if (!button->irq) { > > - dev_err(dev, "Found button without gpio or irq\n"); > > + dev_err(dev, "Found button %s without gpio or irq\n", > > + desc); > > I do not believe description is mandatory, so we may end up printing > "gpio_keys" here. I wonder if it would not be more reliable to print the > index of the problematic key? The description (label) is indeed not mandatory, so without that it is as good as before ;-) For the index, I'm wondering if the iteration order is unambiguous, and cannot change? So perhaps we want to print both ("button %u (%s)")? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c index 0f2250c6aa4978d5..fc706918d7b103cb 100644 --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c @@ -617,14 +617,16 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev, } } else { if (!button->irq) { - dev_err(dev, "Found button without gpio or irq\n"); + dev_err(dev, "Found button %s without gpio or irq\n", + desc); return -EINVAL; } bdata->irq = button->irq; if (button->type && button->type != EV_KEY) { - dev_err(dev, "Only EV_KEY allowed for IRQ buttons.\n"); + dev_err(dev, "Only EV_KEY allowed for IRQ button %s\n", + desc); return -EINVAL; }
When an error message related to IRQ buttons is printed, no clue is given about the actual button that caused the failure. Fix this by including the button label, to make it more obvious which button has an incomplete or incorrect hardware description. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> --- drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)