From patchwork Fri Jun 28 02:19:28 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 11021149 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539B117D2 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A982874C for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 35BCD28780; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD76328748 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726865AbfF1CUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:41 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:20726 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726859AbfF1CUj (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2I3fg026032; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:14 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8xhj8ch-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:14 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2KD70045408; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:13 -0400 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2td8xhj8bt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:20:13 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5S2JYlV031936; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t9by7jp17-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:12 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5S2KBlC12190118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D066112065; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497E112063; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.218.134]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:20:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v12 05/11] ima: Add modsig appraise_type option for module-style appended signatures Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:19:28 -0300 Message-Id: <20190628021934.4260-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190628021934.4260-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-27_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906280019 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Introduce the modsig keyword to the IMA policy syntax to specify that a given hook should expect the file to have the IMA signature appended to it. Here is how it can be used in a rule: appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig With this rule, IMA will accept either a signature stored in the extended attribute or an appended signature. For now, the rule above will behave exactly the same as if appraise_type=imasig was specified. The actual modsig implementation will be introduced separately. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 6 +++++- security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 10 +++++++++ security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 9 ++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 +++++++++-- security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 + 7 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index fc376a323908..29ebe9afdac4 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Description: euid:= decimal value fowner:= decimal value lsm: are LSM specific - option: appraise_type:= [imasig] + option: appraise_type:= [imasig] [imasig|modsig] template:= name of a defined IMA template type (eg, ima-ng). Only valid when action is "measure". pcr:= decimal value @@ -105,3 +105,7 @@ Description: measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK pcr=4 measure func=KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK pcr=5 + + Example of appraise rule allowing modsig appended signatures: + + appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index df65d2d41905..6fa78fbc8c30 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig @@ -232,6 +232,16 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM This option enables the different "ima_appraise=" modes (eg. fix, log) from the boot command line. +config IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG + bool "Support module-style signatures for appraisal" + depends on IMA_APPRAISE + default n + help + Adds support for signatures appended to files. The format of the + appended signature is the same used for signed kernel modules. + The modsig keyword can be used in the IMA policy to allow a hook + to accept such signatures. + config IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING bool "Require all keys on the .ima keyring be signed (deprecated)" depends on IMA_APPRAISE && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile index d921dc4f9eb0..31d57cdf2421 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile @@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IMA) += ima.o ima-y := ima_fs.o ima_queue.o ima_init.o ima_main.o ima_crypto.o ima_api.o \ ima_policy.o ima_template.o ima_template_lib.o ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) += ima_appraise.o +ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) += ima_modsig.o ima-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC) += ima_kexec.o obj-$(CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += ima_mok.o diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 6aa28ab53d27..904f7dd78007 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -306,6 +306,15 @@ static inline int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG +bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func); +#else +static inline bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG */ + /* LSM based policy rules require audit */ #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..87503bfe8c8b --- /dev/null +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +/* + * IMA support for appraising module-style appended signatures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019 IBM Corporation + * + * Author: + * Thiago Jung Bauermann + */ + +#include "ima.h" + +/** + * ima_hook_supports_modsig - can the policy allow modsig for this hook? + * + * modsig is only supported by hooks using ima_post_read_file(), because only + * they preload the contents of the file in a buffer. FILE_CHECK does that in + * some cases, but not when reached from vfs_open(). POLICY_CHECK can support + * it, but it's not useful in practice because it's a text file so deny. + */ +bool ima_hook_supports_modsig(enum ima_hooks func) +{ + switch (func) { + case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK: + case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK: + case MODULE_CHECK: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index a3058b03a955..ac258df2f1f4 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1132,6 +1132,10 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_type", args[0].from); if ((strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig")) == 0) entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED; + else if (ima_hook_supports_modsig(entry->func) && + strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig|modsig") == 0) + entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | + IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED; else result = -EINVAL; break; @@ -1451,8 +1455,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } if (entry->template) seq_printf(m, "template=%s ", entry->template->name); - if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) - seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig "); + if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + if (entry->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED) + seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig|modsig "); + else + seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig "); + } if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) seq_puts(m, "permit_directio "); rcu_read_unlock(); diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index 88a29f72a74f..0e7330a36a9d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #define IMA_NEW_FILE 0x04000000 #define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG 0x08000000 #define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS 0x10000000 +#define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED 0x20000000 #define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \ IMA_HASH | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)