[v11-ima,12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs

Message ID	20191127213718.18267-13-casey@schaufler-ca.com (mailing list archive)
State	New, archived
Headers	show Return-Path: <SRS0=jDa8=ZT=vger.kernel.org=linux-integrity-owner@kernel.org> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com Subject: [v11-ima PATCH 12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:37:05 -0800 Message-Id: <20191127213718.18267-13-casey@schaufler-ca.com> In-Reply-To: <20191127213718.18267-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20191127213718.18267-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk
Series	LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor \| expand [v11-ima,00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor [v11-ima,01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security [v11-ima,02/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure. [v11-ima,03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match [v11-ima,04/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as [v11-ima,05/25] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking [v11-ima,06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid [v11-ima,07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx [v11-ima,08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid [v11-ima,09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid [v11-ima,10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid [v11-ima,11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid [v11-ima,12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs [v11-ima,13/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display [v11-ima,14/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser [v11-ima,15/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx [v11-ima,16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security [v11-ima,17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx [v11-ima,18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter [v11-ima,19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob [v11-ima,20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder [v11-ima,21/25] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary [v11-ima,22/25] Audit: Include object data for all security modules [v11-ima,23/25] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs [v11-ima,24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context [v11-ima,25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index d95b0ece7434..96b6662ea39f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ extern const char *const func_tokens[]; struct modsig; /* LIM API function definitions */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, @@ -232,8 +232,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); void ima_init_policy(void); void ima_update_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 610759fe63b8..1ab769fa7df6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy. * @inode: pointer to inode to measure * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -181,15 +181,15 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask. * */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, + return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 69e549164949..01c755a242ac 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -48,15 +48,13 @@ bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void) */ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { - u32 secid; struct lsmblob blob; if (!ima_appraise) return 0; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - lsmblob_secid(&blob, &secid); - return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), secid, func, mask, + return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &blob, func, mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 4f55d1bcf3fb..86cc1419587e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr, + action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -388,8 +388,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -415,16 +414,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -442,8 +439,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -575,9 +571,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -669,7 +664,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, */ if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], 0, func, + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), &blob, 0, func, &pcr, &template); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c7d2ea47a326..b089d4a8b27b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask) { int i; @@ -431,7 +431,6 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&blob, secid); rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, @@ -475,7 +474,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -488,8 +487,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) { struct ima_rule_entry *entry; @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask)) + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, blob, func, mask)) continue; action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;

[v11-ima,12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs

Commit Message

Patch