From patchwork Thu Jul 22 00:47:46 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Casey Schaufler X-Patchwork-Id: 12392655 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28610C6377B for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0804D61249 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230017AbhGVAVy (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:21:54 -0400 Received: from sonic313-16.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.185.39]:40937 "EHLO sonic313-16.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229953AbhGVAVx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:21:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1626915749; bh=whNleagmPbVrZg9/Fuf5mW+JpWC5kGDHMi1mup7addo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=R5YkLCKy9fIvnoaEzpQ9cxEwjgu508ecn3ffYLWT5OtOFMsOoa4lO10qI4bhQqqx8aqPymWi8wQXxNMFQ+IoTzS45aQOSPyCyaDfauzopr5D21nwhFbJuOJ7JeWYcDacDokQ6CFhLGU8aYIGoEaTdObk7eTSbhrdmVoUcqraFIo0VSfYvfGhgSsigJBrIfFxJU85mXa+dVGlAn+W8y2mf+0JYfj9Ws1KpYT3hl+2+tSKuMuSEx6R6/VDYhVmXJ3m8lnuxmm3CJh4lnraiyvJ8nR/UyJhLWGD8At5CJuTG8qDugxHdYVT3CHkyAIBvkSgyG+lxb4xqfq/uLV780HwRA== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1626915749; bh=hJdcpsScFHLxSuD89GezFmntH+BH72yCXfOIskd5CDy=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=rmlpRO2rQCrJtG8olmSUglvmw+BLcvYnDn08ixWCBIYsgOf5AQD8wiIdPYGW1HFzAeZ87hSFTi4TtFZImrxBqK5Subn4o+yYpHDCjttM7eV6Cst5C1LA2cWd+Jf304/VpAeELEJ+0jO86a3vNjqEIoi+9JZK5a5z/yZTk1xtDUmG3hNzNXaPGr2dRA8wfdb1ECQnk/WbK06mvGpNhg2sfN8v14yZn0NR7dCrygompbjRled26pWRCXxoSkMPdlKYlVGtM8gQSzh42PJxZwuvMPWMrjOhxkOMxvSKvXVismSYjS8USMdOuNTByCm3pCBd5rfYnxb9roaQ2Ewqmk5R3A== X-YMail-OSG: cv_56ycVM1miIdP1HW9xti9tB76zi4yRT7zKbK4HgdPHDocgXhwGKT1W1wGhWi4 ek93MpwV.7iuz4V0cqs12j01yR2jbaySH.G9ZbDcO8X2UKG7MD..UBOwoJMOhQWt6pN6CTV.TIy8 WMvYwDFeTDuss_LZ2EJkec33nrmWnkseYbSWI94LgE9zKftkFdZmBS_6tE9eWDK7dkGixOCTSy57 Uy_LcEujsizhyavfjpa5wrv36cArrROTG.ID8yA5bNIHpUMZF4.IhC4HjKye2.C.HdEHI3uZNpkW XPplhCsLyn_d0Rd8pRYrf8I_kr6fZ10tMuqNXut7rCo88qACcWDA7Riz08w6AD_JJryRN.3OgHDn t4Y1uqVL53Id9gUxFWFYt9h_TdrGiLvomj7RCCGUPN7BgSX9yNv_4hCRFXcVvnbK.pnn3BoIznCQ furuYVE_0937pm3xX9fN7npByIQximTm_giJMxgMQzjuUIh5SMkhFlWxxLI.9xXUhDPCbFi_jVmk 59gAcXCZg9wV4XuLN3W89Q6WxUuzgc4ybNGprfO4mps.CTkMTgE5X81o1ZQNmL8gvxH7cQK_uSHQ AF9UQ15YCd6QHj1Qf4FStMHjF_WTEKAvJQnzLW6pdedIK8DQYz8u3jgz0fwxgkLsulqP._EU5NIc G3ASnpudAn6a9plkUn9LQPXyf5eKI7uW3abUkD_Lywvjb_.jM9YZ9oIGvPY3PROa28LyUXAaJApE sokF0QmIrQZLI6rKD.N_Cnmhbf8ZZzWfZTaBhu0Jb7wAZTWndGec11ee.kxyIc7CCxuNQfgWkdmm d69DVU.uqjLFlhVw5FNSE8VYadrv9jiGmAuXfRiDJhp8vLxE8DBwhQuu0JUdW6HOQDtzKtXcShEO tsoHQsCScyvh5eaPhUHmVyoK9YqesaWYOW3a1QGpoyg6koSmRlsowjPj.yOdw0h9lksQBGbpGNhZ ijg49tJpzRCde0KL1.uqqcNeqW.vsIOkHo3eV301eFgFozQYWdwUHehgNiGEQGVKkC1HBzxdd5hg jWe_dx0Z_gj1KJa17DSoTr4RgJoBqMfMwn7kc9D5aJXdNO3XpR1sT2D9qIo9F6zgiSRz_ek0Lfby 9bNly6mX7CCtnaaUK3PQhz3TLIXuKYNZ9d7MLRyyPOmo6ZaYwqUqMxLHNYZFvWPE2m6V6ZXnTUIt hPnfl_YRKHVjJxh7XhJ9HHJZAiTWeOA.g8AwmAHpBpQfUzcHW6xFObsWyQBZp2jueL5r4zlyECAF B583GqU1Y8EOGM7qrIibWP4mT717qaLKMTtaN9WkKaDSTBLx6TXw9VMXfbwcUJWO_iTgmvCZQCcI XWnQWLuITCZy8a0Q96nZwv45U94TXwzC2jOdfRJ9XApTTSDZEDkX3xtFjj05OnnWNIDk9bQKQtLD .qBw8DA19QzQqcy7Pd9wakblbN6gZROM2QHNvWRUWoVgCFalutYnND6QuxbW0Lzev1NT998vKRV9 bzexr5a7_h_caP0BaRr6ZMDB482ShbVog6Zk79yUT.96BjMbKy6l3ewhmCpcCalJef8WkoUgfOV8 ivoeTyKFWCHFbKcMAroGRKIM3bhZhvbdTiBirppu2gcNSja4IJzHyDhIdkMOD0IauN8pGMAb3R4b jn7vxe0PMaqingFhf9RcsatED_SSi0QAL4jKWaBjYU.wgxj.HLWVxZkRJv6E1C.hHvGbPP97Q2JB qFfGI.Xr8vmfm9SVAZZXji_w01SLBdNeJ52dXeBUnwixpgzsTRHSvuOiclzJswPfBz1VD29GK0qQ Kxj3XuTZqxvF3lTtP11BYrCNSCIvI9HIC6_sYLPX.NcFW.RQezidgCezTX56yU6Sc0mhstm1jBoN kZS_fuH0NIiX44kbeA49uWDK82gspTgrcvKLapoFLVnlj4V4ZD4ZaUCWZ002UpUie7_mcQEdkzp_ 44aqTiR.2DQOHpORattrE9Xp.vcUv2v.jlPxP8Iv9nl4IYH8IFcUH2bcc_A7ipEgV44FSYaWF0ey deXtTbJUUdqadbPeA5n7PNXwXj1kMV53bWrM2YW5zKhZHQvYBkQLx2asskHO8I8b4m6wOnXWsFmT iwfj70_teL1._Iz3kDivvvEysSDqBTL786BPnM_Pf2DhtXqrtDa9nIpeTvbSvCJrZrfCY5RhAPWu N5.IlJHFEbYbI51g0vzwKGiNZfhhaH6S3lxT5EtXI5zFK_UUUcF4ieWmcSKSGa0vjXUIcrObPxfH m5mtWuIb4QVmrc.CYjGglXCqjc1vZF6SofKBelLMXO2nf0Ya5tqHO2OccZJMKWZzz78M5rP4Cti0 .CKaW0OP5RBJ98qAz_zzF3HPovOD0MTYPy63HVCN4Qd_y8KZsZX725H8uNBr7p3s5iVkln9BiScy bvfEdm9qViDkN5DvSTa.nE7Uz9i2njU3.3QFg4ZuiFWY1EVgWuVO7lVid07rLmYZpeMEj9FVyoid jd21zJMRsTJBFgS5zRjUhTsvrlTdnMvblE3k5ia1jw_Uqe3scSfa_Bwwh0xm4AhNZXZ7fj6dZ6LC Rnoz4ABcCuWFPRdkQovdBP0l0veXkFReScoG5rWItQDFf8BJvqCKmZWaOdIADPTVtwYVrtSjEo.z 5CRou1fEvLYQpokEVADfE.Gz1N_MWm7QNqNND15p.5bOYgdwS9zpwkGJf3fdrwR8SopG6Dv4zhbm v6RRbMGbbcmXcAMiBMFBhG2N8JrNq1UAtZgO2.WEjLMWD_KQharxBuxCpBw5ifAxlXIrZnOp6a_j 4otOWqWvPBrm7LqfbtgG.UMTNdc2CZu22XKjeoogKm1nQUD8u3lGI4zN7VM6dz8o14uR6nYC7Lvo _mR5pzLV7V8BdodEFZaZ__7CyShETr0NCnExuO7f1TtfA3Rp7vdYPxY5ApT6AS7jjOw4YLR2Khy_ Laukq8cIvKaFRwb4iPIlz3Znh7C..UxuJqBzXyVQt6s9k_qk6hYLTfRxv0QYk8nT9oPhCxXjPaQg S2iLVbCxOI9_pDjch2dHg75oau3jP1JkcMTSloOORVwLtQp3EGIn1lokX7DIBYAZuO_s_1MXpRze _bBs_sUYmRmXPrFancGr1d_ZxiCFNkGvhuyXry1zBPIBnKM439tjLbr5IYDHZyPU51GS4Rpv60XG VP4z37n3YWxz7QiUkul4btC8CYjZT6Y_pP5e2T5iCuHjdYkmRt2uPLv7RTPPzUD6kp2yTc.y9ihf zyjZj_f7Lm8zXpNpJpVJojdzyAV_zbOQOdEqgTEXFAxLZPiST X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:02:29 +0000 Received: by kubenode532.mail-prod1.omega.ne1.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 10608ef7f8774cba27287058399213ae; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:02:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v28 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:47:46 -0700 Message-Id: <20210722004758.12371-14-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20210722004758.12371-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy() call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: John Johansen Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org To: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 ++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 6 ++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 5 ++-- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 36 +++++++++++---------------- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++------- 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 55f3bd4f0b01..a6b59fcaf62a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {} /* LIM API function definitions */ int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *func_data); @@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, - int mask, int flags, int *pcr, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, + enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *func_data); void ima_init_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index d8e321cc6936..691f68d478f1 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the mount the inode was found from * @inode: pointer to the inode associated with the object being validated * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * */ int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *func_data) @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ int ima_get_action(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, cred, secid, func, mask, + return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc, func_data); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index e3d903d6e5e7..de50ed4df878 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -77,10 +77,9 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, return 0; security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding the .secid[0] */ return ima_match_policy(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(), - blob.secid[0], func, mask, - IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL); + &blob, func, mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, + NULL, NULL, NULL); } static int ima_fix_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index de084954d0b9..2bcbfb577860 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -194,8 +194,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(file), inode, cred, secid, + action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(file), inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc, NULL); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -392,8 +392,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -434,7 +433,7 @@ int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot) inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file); /* scaffolding */ action = ima_get_action(file_mnt_user_ns(vma->vm_file), inode, - current_cred(), blob.secid[0], MAY_EXEC, + current_cred(), &blob, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, NULL); /* Is the mmap'ed file in policy? */ @@ -473,16 +472,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -500,8 +497,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -698,9 +694,8 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id, /* Read entire file for all partial reads. */ func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, - 0, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_READ, func); } const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = { @@ -742,9 +737,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -889,7 +883,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, security_task_getsecid_subj(current, &blob); /* scaffolding */ action = ima_get_action(mnt_userns, inode, current_cred(), - blob.secid[0], 0, func, &pcr, &template, + &blob, 0, func, &pcr, &template, func_data); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 6d112ec89c1b..a2b8c0ad8b74 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the mount the inode was found from * @inode: a pointer to an inode * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation - * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: the lsm data of the task to be validated * @func: LIM hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL @@ -558,8 +558,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, - const char *func_data) + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, + int mask, const char *func_data) { int i; @@ -628,8 +628,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&lsmdata, secid); - rc = ima_filter_rule_match(&lsmdata, rule->lsm[i].type, + rc = ima_filter_rule_match(blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, rule->lsm[i].rule); break; @@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -688,8 +687,8 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, - int mask, int flags, int *pcr, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, + enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, const char *func_data) { @@ -705,7 +704,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, mnt_userns, inode, cred, secid, + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, mnt_userns, inode, cred, blob, func, mask, func_data)) continue;