Message ID | 20211104140211.6258-3-amirmizi6@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add tpm i2c ptp driver | expand |
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 16:02 +0200, amirmizi6@gmail.com wrote: > From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@gmail.com> > > tpm_tis_req_canceled() function is used to check if the caller requested > to abort the current operation. It was found that in some cases > tpm_tis_req_canceled() wrongly returned true. Please, bring some context, i.e. please describe the scenarios. > Since a cancel request sets the TPM_STS.commandReady field to TRUE, the ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What the heck is this? Please refer the exact things. > tpm_tis_req_canceled() function should check only the TPM_STS.commandReady > field value. Why? > The case for TPM_VID_WINBOND is wrong and was therefore removed. Why? It is not removed in the existing mainline, so it definitely *was not* removed. > Also, the default comparison is wrong. Only cmdReady bit needs to be > compared instead of the full lower status register byte. You should split this into two patches, if it fixes two different issues. /Jarkko
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c index f833f35..6ff8b44 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c @@ -661,13 +661,10 @@ static bool tpm_tis_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status) struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); switch (priv->manufacturer_id) { - case TPM_VID_WINBOND: - return ((status == TPM_STS_VALID) || - (status == (TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY))); case TPM_VID_STM: return (status == (TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY)); default: - return (status == TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY); + return (status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY) == TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY; } }