Message ID | 20180815142749.18804-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Kbuild: Some fixdep tweaks | expand |
On 15 August 2018 at 16:27, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote: > These patches eliminate two (albeit tiny and shortlived) processes > from the cmd_and_fixdep rule, i.e. from every TU being > compiled. Whether the diffstat below is worth it I'll leave to Kbuild > maintainers to decide. Ping.
Hi Rasmus, 2018年9月27日(木) 3:58 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>: > > On 15 August 2018 at 16:27, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote: > > These patches eliminate two (albeit tiny and shortlived) processes > > from the cmd_and_fixdep rule, i.e. from every TU being > > compiled. Whether the diffstat below is worth it I'll leave to Kbuild > > maintainers to decide. > > Ping. Sorry for delay. As far as I tested, the performance improvement was not noticeable level. This patch set actually sits on the fence. I tend to choose not-apply when I cannot make up my mind. If you have something more to convince me, please let me know.
On 2018-09-28 04:21, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Rasmus, > > This patch set actually sits on the fence. > I tend to choose not-apply when I cannot make up my mind. > > If you have something more to convince me, please let me know. No, that's fine. I agree that the overall performance improvement for whole kernel builds is hard to measure, but that can be said for many small optimizations. Anyway, as I said, it's up to you, so let's just drop it. Thanks, Rasmus